You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2008/12/04 21:16:34 UTC

SpamAssassin lists now support BATV and SRS (fwd)

fyi.

------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:41:08 -0800
From:    Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
To:      Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>
cc:      Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>,
	 Apache Infrastructure <in...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r722791 - /infrastructure/apmail/trunk/.ezmlmrc

Done, thanks!


--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> wrote:

> From: Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r722791 - /infrastructure/apmail/trunk/.ezmlmrc
> To: joe_schaefer@yahoo.com
> Cc: "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org>, "Apache Infrastructure" <infrastructure
@apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:34 AM
> Let me know if you want to roll it out for
> users@SpamAssassin and dev@ .
> I'm sure some folks there would be interested...
> 
> --j.
> 
> Joe Schaefer writes:
> > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, Mark Thomas
> <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, joes@apache.org
> <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> Log:
> > > >> SRS + BATV support for ezmlm.
> > > >> Roy, please review carefully ;-).
> > > > 
> > > > I don't want to roll this out to every
> list until
> > > > Roy has looked
> > > > over the patch, but I wouldn't mind
> upgrading a
> > > > few lists where
> > > > people have already banged into this.  Any
> list
> > > > moderators
> > > > willing to be guinea pigs to see how this
> plays out?
> > > 
> > > We get the odd issue on the Tomcat lists from
> time to time.
> > > Feel free to add it to the users @ dev lists.
> > 
> > Done, but I'm really looking for lists where
> moderators will announce
> > experimental support for this knowing that some folks
> are interested
> > in it.  If people using SRS or BATV are already
> subscribed to the list,
> > this won't help them directly, at least not
> without moderator intervention.
> > The next step is figuring out if we can upgrade those
> list subscriptions
> > without screwing up folk's mail delivery.


      


------- End of Forwarded Message