You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2005/10/28 10:53:49 UTC
gbuild subproject?
What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in
svn where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the
scripts directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning
and organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start
formalizing this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in
the mix the standard answer could be something like check out these
things from svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the
primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
Thoughts?
-David
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 10/28/2005 1:53 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in
> svn where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the
> scripts directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning
> and organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start
> formalizing this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in
> the mix the standard answer could be something like check out these
> things from svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
> those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the
> primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
0
This strikes me as an infra thing. It would be nice to offer this to
other projects as well.
Regards,
Alan
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> +1
>
> Lets figure out how to manage these distributed builds and then help
> other ASF projects take advantage of it.
I suggest talking with the Gump project, since they've been
all about automatic and distributed and coordinated building
since day one. Maybe they have some useful knowledge.
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ2KODJrNPMCpn3XdAQLvbAP+MMN1AYctu5gc4AVcDbU4kb6hI4TtDhU8
YrQUVTY1c/QYX9KExQ9ZkpcrG4wmCbIcA0ujYN7F6Kk/OdHsQ4b0zbjohdWRYxUz
Zi6qd9tR0m+PWdjrB9tr7lptfJxo5FmYPXxCio56Nx9THwHVJhRUdenftiHWGPft
ZSwiJ2KtWvs=
=KjGY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
Lets figure out how to manage these distributed builds and then help
other ASF projects take advantage of it.
-dain
On Oct 28, 2005, at 1:53 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in
> svn where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the
> scripts directory I created months back into it and work on
> cleaning and organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to
> start formalizing this thing so that when someone wants to throw a
> box in the mix the standard answer could be something like check
> out these things from svn, follow these instructions, send us your
> keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
> those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is
> the primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1 excellent idea
david jencks
On Oct 28, 2005, at 1:53 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in svn
> where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the scripts
> directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning and
> organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start formalizing
> this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in the mix the
> standard answer could be something like check out these things from
> svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
> those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the
> primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by John Sisson <js...@apache.org>.
+1 Good idea
John
David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in svn
> where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the scripts
> directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning and
> organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start formalizing
> this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in the mix the
> standard answer could be something like check out these things from
> svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But those
> complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the primary
> focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org>.
David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in svn
> where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the scripts
> directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning and
> organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start formalizing
> this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in the mix the
> standard answer could be something like check out these things from
> svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But those
> complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the primary
> focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
+1. I wonder how much similarities it has (or will have) with Gump, but
we'll see it afterwards.
> -David
Jacek
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
Works for me
Aaron
On 10/28/05, Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> +1 from me. This is an excellent idea.
>
> Jeff
>
> David Blevins wrote:
> > What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
> >
> > I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in svn
> > where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the scripts
> > directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning and
> > organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start formalizing
> > this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in the mix the
> > standard answer could be something like check out these things from
> > svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
> >
> > I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> > building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But those
> > complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the primary
> > focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > -David
>
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.
David,
+1 from me. This is an excellent idea.
Jeff
David Blevins wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in svn
> where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the scripts
> directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning and
> organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start formalizing
> this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in the mix the
> standard answer could be something like check out these things from
> svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But those
> complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the primary
> focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
+1
Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 10/28/05, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
>>What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>>
>>I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in
>>svn where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the
>>scripts directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning
>>and organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start
>>formalizing this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in
>>the mix the standard answer could be something like check out these
>>things from svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>>
>>I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
>>building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
>>those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the
>>primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
>
> A very good idea. Being able to tell someone to check out a project
> from SVN is a great way to ramp up a box in the farm.
>
> +1
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> The Castor Project
> http://www.castor.org/
>
> Apache Geronimo
> http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
>
>
Re: gbuild subproject?
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 10/28/05, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> What do you guys think about a gbuild subproject?
>
> I'd really like at least a category in jira and at least a spot in
> svn where we can check in scripts and docco. We could move the
> scripts directory I created months back into it and work on cleaning
> and organizing this stuff. I guess I'd really like to start
> formalizing this thing so that when someone wants to throw a box in
> the mix the standard answer could be something like check out these
> things from svn, follow these instructions, send us your keys, etc.
>
> I know there are non-geronimo specific facets (openejb, activemq
> building code, etc) which could make it odd as a subproject. But
> those complexities are there in our build anyway and Geronimo is the
> primary focus, so it might be better go keep things close to home.
>
> Thoughts?
A very good idea. Being able to tell someone to check out a project
from SVN is a great way to ramp up a box in the farm.
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/