You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/14 09:07:29 UTC
New release cycle.
WDYT? :-)
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
If nothing is left to be done - why not. :-)
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 14.11.2019 um 10:07 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> WDYT? :-)
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
Re: modal
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi Andrew,
please take a look at my pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/375
Seems we are both looking for a similar solution.
Have fun
Sven
Am 20. November 2019 23:51:38 MEZ schrieb Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>:
>I did setup a simple *static* demo with plain popup:
>http://barlama.ru/popup-demo.html
>
>Most of the javascript is actually unnecessary, all this stuff can be
>handled with wicket ajax.
>
>
>
>чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 11:20, Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>:
>
>> Hi Sven and Andrea!
>>
>> I'd suggest pure CSS popup handled by wicket ajax. Maybe very simple
>js to
>> add some class to the body (for example to add a blur).
>>
>> ```
>> <div id="popup" class="open">
>> <i class="icon-window-close" id="popup__close"></i>
>> <div class="popup__outer">
>> <div id="popup__content">
>> <div>My beautiful popup content</div>
>> </div>
>> </div>
>> </div>
>> ```
>>
>> ```
>> body.has-popup {
>> overflow: hidden;
>> }
>> body.has-popup>.container {
>> filter: blur(5px);
>> overflow: hidden;
>> }
>> #popup {
>> overflow-y: auto;
>> }
>> #popup__close {
>> display: none;
>> }
>> #popup__content {
>> max-width: 700px;
>> margin: 0 auto;
>> background: #222222AA;
>> padding: 10px;
>> }
>> #popup.open {
>> position: fixed;
>> width: 100vw; height: 100vh;
>> left: 0; top: 0;
>> }
>> #popup.open .popup__outer {
>> display: flex;
>> justify-content: center;
>> flex-direction: column;
>> min-height: 100%;
>> margin-bottom: 50px; /* fix issue with chrome control bar */
>> }
>> #popup.open #popup__close {
>> position: fixed;
>> top: 20px; right: 20px;
>> font-size: 200%;
>> display: block;
>> }
>> #popup.open #popup__close:before {
>> text-shadow: 0 0 10px grey;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> *```*
>>
>> чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 04:41, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> sorry my mistake, the most recent issue on this topic is:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6666
>>>
>>> And there are two branches actually with Igor's
>>> (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog) and my (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2)
>proposal
>>> respectively.
>>>
>>> IMHO we should try to find a very simple solution for the common
>middle
>>> ground that
>>> - supports more than just alert dialogs, e.g. forms
>>> - doesn't impose huge markup on users
>>> - doesn't need much if configuration
>>> - isn't a one-fits-all component (we'll fail with that anyway)
>>> - is Wicket-y, e.g server rendered, no JS required and simple
>>>
>>> Have fun
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 20. November 2019 15:48:24 MEZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>>> >To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
>>> >'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
>>> >
>>> >On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene
><an...@gmail.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Thank you !
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev
><an...@kondratev.pro>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with
>WICKET-6703
>>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or
>WICKET-3404
>>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>> Andrew
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > Hi Andrea,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > both issues are ready.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which
>IMHO
>>> >is a
>>> >>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Have fun
>>> >>> > Sven
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> >>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's
>my
>>> >>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
>>> >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is
>nearly
>>> >>> > completed, so
>>> >>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if
>I'm
>>> >>> wrong.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >> Hi Andrea,
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket
>9.
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal
>>> >window"
>>> >>> too:
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> Have fun
>>> >>> > >> Sven
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >>
>>> >>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> >>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
>>> >>> > >>>
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Andrea Del Bene.
>>> >Apache Wicket committer.
>>>
>>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>.
I did setup a simple *static* demo with plain popup:
http://barlama.ru/popup-demo.html
Most of the javascript is actually unnecessary, all this stuff can be
handled with wicket ajax.
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 11:20, Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>:
> Hi Sven and Andrea!
>
> I'd suggest pure CSS popup handled by wicket ajax. Maybe very simple js to
> add some class to the body (for example to add a blur).
>
> ```
> <div id="popup" class="open">
> <i class="icon-window-close" id="popup__close"></i>
> <div class="popup__outer">
> <div id="popup__content">
> <div>My beautiful popup content</div>
> </div>
> </div>
> </div>
> ```
>
> ```
> body.has-popup {
> overflow: hidden;
> }
> body.has-popup>.container {
> filter: blur(5px);
> overflow: hidden;
> }
> #popup {
> overflow-y: auto;
> }
> #popup__close {
> display: none;
> }
> #popup__content {
> max-width: 700px;
> margin: 0 auto;
> background: #222222AA;
> padding: 10px;
> }
> #popup.open {
> position: fixed;
> width: 100vw; height: 100vh;
> left: 0; top: 0;
> }
> #popup.open .popup__outer {
> display: flex;
> justify-content: center;
> flex-direction: column;
> min-height: 100%;
> margin-bottom: 50px; /* fix issue with chrome control bar */
> }
> #popup.open #popup__close {
> position: fixed;
> top: 20px; right: 20px;
> font-size: 200%;
> display: block;
> }
> #popup.open #popup__close:before {
> text-shadow: 0 0 10px grey;
> }
>
>
>
> *```*
>
> чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 04:41, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> sorry my mistake, the most recent issue on this topic is:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6666
>>
>> And there are two branches actually with Igor's
>> (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog) and my (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2) proposal
>> respectively.
>>
>> IMHO we should try to find a very simple solution for the common middle
>> ground that
>> - supports more than just alert dialogs, e.g. forms
>> - doesn't impose huge markup on users
>> - doesn't need much if configuration
>> - isn't a one-fits-all component (we'll fail with that anyway)
>> - is Wicket-y, e.g server rendered, no JS required and simple
>>
>> Have fun
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 20. November 2019 15:48:24 MEZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
>> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
>> >To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
>> >'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
>> >
>> >On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thank you !
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi!
>> >>>
>> >>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Andrew
>> >>>
>> >>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Hi Andrea,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > both issues are ready.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO
>> >is a
>> >>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Have fun
>> >>> > Sven
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> >>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
>> >>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
>> >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
>> >>> > completed, so
>> >>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm
>> >>> wrong.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>> >wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >> Hi Andrea,
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal
>> >window"
>> >>> too:
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> Have fun
>> >>> > >> Sven
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> >>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >--
>> >Andrea Del Bene.
>> >Apache Wicket committer.
>>
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>.
Hi Sven and Andrea!
I'd suggest pure CSS popup handled by wicket ajax. Maybe very simple js to
add some class to the body (for example to add a blur).
```
<div id="popup" class="open">
<i class="icon-window-close" id="popup__close"></i>
<div class="popup__outer">
<div id="popup__content">
<div>My beautiful popup content</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
```
```
body.has-popup {
overflow: hidden;
}
body.has-popup>.container {
filter: blur(5px);
overflow: hidden;
}
#popup {
overflow-y: auto;
}
#popup__close {
display: none;
}
#popup__content {
max-width: 700px;
margin: 0 auto;
background: #222222AA;
padding: 10px;
}
#popup.open {
position: fixed;
width: 100vw; height: 100vh;
left: 0; top: 0;
}
#popup.open .popup__outer {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 100%;
margin-bottom: 50px; /* fix issue with chrome control bar */
}
#popup.open #popup__close {
position: fixed;
top: 20px; right: 20px;
font-size: 200%;
display: block;
}
#popup.open #popup__close:before {
text-shadow: 0 0 10px grey;
}
*```*
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 04:41, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> sorry my mistake, the most recent issue on this topic is:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6666
>
> And there are two branches actually with Igor's (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog)
> and my (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2) proposal respectively.
>
> IMHO we should try to find a very simple solution for the common middle
> ground that
> - supports more than just alert dialogs, e.g. forms
> - doesn't impose huge markup on users
> - doesn't need much if configuration
> - isn't a one-fits-all component (we'll fail with that anyway)
> - is Wicket-y, e.g server rendered, no JS required and simple
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 20. November 2019 15:48:24 MEZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
> an.delbene@gmail.com>:
> >To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
> >'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you !
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Andrew
> >>>
> >>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi Andrea,
> >>> >
> >>> > both issues are ready.
> >>> >
> >>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO
> >is a
> >>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
> >>> >
> >>> > Have fun
> >>> > Sven
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> >>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
> >>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
> >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
> >>> > completed, so
> >>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm
> >>> wrong.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
> >wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Hi Andrea,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal
> >window"
> >>> too:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Have fun
> >>> > >> Sven
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> >>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Andrea Del Bene.
> >Apache Wicket committer.
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi Andrea,
sorry my mistake, the most recent issue on this topic is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6666
And there are two branches actually with Igor's (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog) and my (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2) proposal respectively.
IMHO we should try to find a very simple solution for the common middle ground that
- supports more than just alert dialogs, e.g. forms
- doesn't impose huge markup on users
- doesn't need much if configuration
- isn't a one-fits-all component (we'll fail with that anyway)
- is Wicket-y, e.g server rendered, no JS required and simple
Have fun
Sven
Am 20. November 2019 15:48:24 MEZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
>'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
>
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Thank you !
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>>>
>>> > Hi Andrea,
>>> >
>>> > both issues are ready.
>>> >
>>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO
>is a
>>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
>>> >
>>> > Have fun
>>> > Sven
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
>>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
>>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
>>> > completed, so
>>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm
>>> wrong.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
>wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Andrea,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal
>window"
>>> too:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Have fun
>>> > >> Sven
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
>>> > >>>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
>--
>Andrea Del Bene.
>Apache Wicket committer.
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thank you !
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrew
>>
>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>>
>> > Hi Andrea,
>> >
>> > both issues are ready.
>> >
>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO is a
>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
>> >
>> > Have fun
>> > Sven
>> >
>> >
>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
>> > completed, so
>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm
>> wrong.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Andrea,
>> > >>
>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>> > >>
>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
>> > >>
>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window"
>> too:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>> > >>
>> > >> Have fun
>> > >> Sven
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
>> > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Thank you !
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > both issues are ready.
> >
> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO is a
> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
> >
> > Have fun
> > Sven
> >
> >
> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
> > completed, so
> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Andrea,
> > >>
> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
> > >>
> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
> > >>
> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window"
> too:
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
> > >>
> > >> Have fun
> > >> Sven
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> > >>> WDYT? :-)
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrew Kondratev <an...@kondratev.pro>.
Hi!
Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
Cheers,
Andrew
ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> both issues are ready.
>
> Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO is a
> really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
> On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
> > understanding that WICKET-6703
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
> completed, so
> > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrea,
> >>
> >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
> >>
> >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
> >>
> >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window" too:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
> >>
> >> Have fun
> >> Sven
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> >>> WDYT? :-)
> >>>
> >
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi Andrea,
both issues are ready.
Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO is a
really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
Have fun
Sven
On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
> understanding that WICKET-6703
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly completed, so
> we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>>
>> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
>>
>> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window" too:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>>
>> Have fun
>> Sven
>>
>>
>> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>> WDYT? :-)
>>>
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
understanding that WICKET-6703
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly completed, so
we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm wrong.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
>
> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
>
> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window" too:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> > WDYT? :-)
> >
>
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi Andrea,
IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal window" too:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
Have fun
Sven
On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> WDYT? :-)
>
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <re...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:30 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> I would add WICKET-6703 to wicket-9
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 14:17, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > + 1
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:07 AM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > WDYT? :-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrea Del Bene.
> > > Apache Wicket committer.
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
+1
I would add WICKET-6703 to wicket-9
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 14:17, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> + 1
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:07 AM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > WDYT? :-)
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
> >
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: New release cycle.
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
+ 1
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:07 AM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> WDYT? :-)
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
>