You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-dev@xerces.apache.org by Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/02 23:12:17 UTC
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Hello Michael,
I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few things to
clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity resolver. Can you
briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can apply it in the project.
I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more like bug
name and I think it is better to change the name as "Validating against
multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What do you suggest for this?
I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your feedback and
submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is 6th of April).
Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<mr...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
> Hi Shakya,
>
> I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is working
> correctly. He described a work around for that specific case, not a general
> solution.
>
> I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema documents to
> SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same namespace and that
> Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
>
> It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to internally
> generate a synthetic schema document which combines the user's list of
> schema documents together. From the schema loader's perspective this would
> look like one master schema document for the namespace which has includes
> to all the others. Taking that a step further, another schema document
> could be generated which glues all the namespaces together with imports.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/20/2012 12:56:37
> AM:
>
> > Hello Michael,
>
> >
> > I was looking at the JIRA issue you have given [1]. According to the
> > comment Mukul has mentioned, it is not a bug, because when the
> > "schema1.xsd" is loaded "schema2.xsd" is resolved since the latter
> > file is already included in the "schema1.xsd". I am not sure whether
> > I should continue working on this and hope your opinion.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1130
> >
> > Regards,
>
> >
> > Shakya Wijerama
> >
> > Senior Student,
> > Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> > Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
>
>
--
Regards,
*Shakya Wijerama*
Senior Student,
Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Shakya,
Congratulations! Looking forward to working with you over the summer.
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 23/04/2012 03:34:51
PM:
> Hello Michael & Devs,
>
> It is a great pleasure to tell you that I have been selected to GSoC
> 2012. I would like to make this a chance to thank all the devs in
> the community who supported me to write a good proposal & my special
> thanks goes to Michael who always responded quickly and reviewed my
> proposal multiple times. I hope to give my best in this summer and
> would like to share opinions with you to make the project a success.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Shakya Wijerama
<shakya.wijerama@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> I improved my proposal according to your response. I have attached
> the finalized proposal herewith and updated the proposal in Google
melange.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Michael Glavassevich
<mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > wrote:
> Hello Shakya,
>
> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/04/2012 06:53:59
PM:
>
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I have completed my proposal and submitted it to Google under Apache
> > Software Foundation. I have attached the proposal as a PDF file with
> > this mail. Can you give me a feedback on it so I can change the
> > proposal before the deadline (April 6th)?
>
>
> I've read through your proposal. This looks really great.
>
> One thing you might want to expand on is the synthetic schema
> example and how that might look when there are multiple namespaces
involved.
>
> For instance, given a Source[] containing:
>
> a.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
> b.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
> c.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
> d.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
>
> ==================================
>
> You would need two levels of generated schemas. For example:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated1.xsd"/>
> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated2.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> generated1.xsd:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="n">
> <xs:include schemaLocation="a.xsd"/>
> <xs:include schemaLocation="b.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> generated2.xsd:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="m">
> <xs:include schemaLocation="c.xsd"/>
> <xs:include schemaLocation="d.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> > I am not sure whether others can view the images in the proposal
> > which I submitted to the Google. How can I know it?
> I can view the images in the proposal you submitted to Google. I
> assume others would be able to as well.
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > wrote:
> > Hello Shakya,
> >
> > Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012
05:12:17 PM:
> >
> > > Hello Michael,
> > >
> > > I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
> > > things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
> > > resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
> > > apply it in the project.
>
> > For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a
> > call out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import.
> > This allows the application to resolve the location of the schema
> > document in some other way than the default of opening the URL
> > specified on the include/import. The includes and imports in the
> > synthetic schemas you generate should resolve back to the Source
> > objects that were passed to SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would
> > need to create an implementation of XMLEntityResolver which handles
> > this custom resolution and register it with the SchemaFactory.
> >
> > > I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
> > > like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
> > > "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
> > > do you suggest for this?
>
> > Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
> >
> > > I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
> > > modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
> > > feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is
> > 6thof April).
> > >
> > > Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
>
> > Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
> >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > Hi Shakya,
> > >
> > > I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
> > > working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
> > > case, not a general solution.
> > >
> > > I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
> > > documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
> > > namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process
that.
> > >
> > > It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
> > > internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
> > > user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
> > > perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
> > > namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
> > > further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
> > > the namespaces together with imports.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Michael Glavassevich
> > > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > > IBM Toronto Lab
> > > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/
> > xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Shakya Wijerama
> >
> > Senior Student,
> > Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> > Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
>
> Thanks.
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shakya Wijerama
>
> Senior Student,
> Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shakya Wijerama
>
> Senior Student,
> Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hello Michael & Devs,
It is a great pleasure to tell you that I have been selected to GSoC 2012.
I would like to make this a chance to thank all the devs in the community
who supported me to write a good proposal & my special thanks goes to
Michael who always responded quickly and reviewed my proposal multiple
times. I hope to give my best in this summer and would like to share
opinions with you to make the project a success.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Shakya Wijerama
<sh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> I improved my proposal according to your response. I have attached the
> finalized proposal herewith and updated the proposal in Google melange.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello Shakya,
>>
>> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/04/2012 06:53:59
>> PM:
>>
>> > Hello Michael,
>> >
>> > I have completed my proposal and submitted it to Google under Apache
>> > Software Foundation. I have attached the proposal as a PDF file with
>> > this mail. Can you give me a feedback on it so I can change the
>> > proposal before the deadline (April 6th)?
>>
>>
>> I've read through your proposal. This looks really great.
>>
>> One thing you might want to expand on is the synthetic schema example and
>> how that might look when there are multiple namespaces involved.
>>
>> For instance, given a Source[] containing:
>>
>> a.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
>> b.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
>> c.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
>> d.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
>>
>> ==================================
>>
>> You would need two levels of generated schemas. For example:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated1.xsd"/>
>> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated2.xsd"/>
>> </xs:schema>
>>
>> generated1.xsd:
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>> targetNamespace="n">
>> <xs:include schemaLocation="a.xsd"/>
>> <xs:include schemaLocation="b.xsd"/>
>> </xs:schema>
>>
>> generated2.xsd:
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>> targetNamespace="m">
>> <xs:include schemaLocation="c.xsd"/>
>> <xs:include schemaLocation="d.xsd"/>
>> </xs:schema>
>>
>> > I am not sure whether others can view the images in the proposal
>> > which I submitted to the Google. How can I know it?
>>
>> I can view the images in the proposal you submitted to Google. I assume
>> others would be able to as well.
>>
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
>> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> > > wrote:
>> > Hello Shakya,
>> >
>> > Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012
>> 05:12:17 PM:
>> >
>> > > Hello Michael,
>> > >
>> > > I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
>> > > things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
>> > > resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
>> > > apply it in the project.
>>
>> > For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a
>> > call out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import.
>> > This allows the application to resolve the location of the schema
>> > document in some other way than the default of opening the URL
>> > specified on the include/import. The includes and imports in the
>> > synthetic schemas you generate should resolve back to the Source
>> > objects that were passed to SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would
>> > need to create an implementation of XMLEntityResolver which handles
>> > this custom resolution and register it with the SchemaFactory.
>> >
>> > > I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
>> > > like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
>> > > "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
>> > > do you suggest for this?
>>
>> > Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
>> >
>> > > I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
>> > > modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
>> > > feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is
>> > 6thof April).
>> > >
>> > > Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
>>
>> > Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
>> >
>> > > Thanks.
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
>> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > Hi Shakya,
>> > >
>> > > I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
>> > > working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
>> > > case, not a general solution.
>> > >
>> > > I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
>> > > documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
>> > > namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
>> > >
>> > > It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
>> > > internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
>> > > user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
>> > > perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
>> > > namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
>> > > further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
>> > > the namespaces together with imports.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > Michael Glavassevich
>> > > XML Technologies and WAS Development
>> > > IBM Toronto Lab
>> > > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> > > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>>
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/
>> > xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
>> >
>> > Michael Glavassevich
>> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
>> > IBM Toronto Lab
>> > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Shakya Wijerama
>> >
>> > Senior Student,
>> > Faculty of Applied Sciences,
>> > Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Michael Glavassevich
>> XML Technologies and WAS Development
>> IBM Toronto Lab
>> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *Shakya Wijerama*
>
> Senior Student,
> Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
*Shakya Wijerama*
Senior Student,
Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hello Michael,
I improved my proposal according to your response. I have attached the
finalized proposal herewith and updated the proposal in Google melange.
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
> Hello Shakya,
>
> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/04/2012 06:53:59
> PM:
>
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I have completed my proposal and submitted it to Google under Apache
> > Software Foundation. I have attached the proposal as a PDF file with
> > this mail. Can you give me a feedback on it so I can change the
> > proposal before the deadline (April 6th)?
>
>
> I've read through your proposal. This looks really great.
>
> One thing you might want to expand on is the synthetic schema example and
> how that might look when there are multiple namespaces involved.
>
> For instance, given a Source[] containing:
>
> a.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
> b.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
> c.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
> d.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
>
> ==================================
>
> You would need two levels of generated schemas. For example:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated1.xsd"/>
> <xs:import schemaLocation="generated2.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> generated1.xsd:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> targetNamespace="n">
> <xs:include schemaLocation="a.xsd"/>
> <xs:include schemaLocation="b.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> generated2.xsd:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> targetNamespace="m">
> <xs:include schemaLocation="c.xsd"/>
> <xs:include schemaLocation="d.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> > I am not sure whether others can view the images in the proposal
> > which I submitted to the Google. How can I know it?
>
> I can view the images in the proposal you submitted to Google. I assume
> others would be able to as well.
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > wrote:
> > Hello Shakya,
> >
> > Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012
> 05:12:17 PM:
> >
> > > Hello Michael,
> > >
> > > I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
> > > things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
> > > resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
> > > apply it in the project.
>
> > For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a
> > call out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import.
> > This allows the application to resolve the location of the schema
> > document in some other way than the default of opening the URL
> > specified on the include/import. The includes and imports in the
> > synthetic schemas you generate should resolve back to the Source
> > objects that were passed to SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would
> > need to create an implementation of XMLEntityResolver which handles
> > this custom resolution and register it with the SchemaFactory.
> >
> > > I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
> > > like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
> > > "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
> > > do you suggest for this?
>
> > Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
> >
> > > I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
> > > modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
> > > feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is
> > 6thof April).
> > >
> > > Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
>
> > Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
> >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > Hi Shakya,
> > >
> > > I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
> > > working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
> > > case, not a general solution.
> > >
> > > I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
> > > documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
> > > namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
> > >
> > > It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
> > > internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
> > > user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
> > > perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
> > > namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
> > > further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
> > > the namespaces together with imports.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Michael Glavassevich
> > > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > > IBM Toronto Lab
> > > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/
> > xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Shakya Wijerama
> >
> > Senior Student,
> > Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> > Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
>
> Thanks.
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
--
Regards,
*Shakya Wijerama*
Senior Student,
Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hello Shakya,
Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/04/2012 06:53:59
PM:
> Hello Michael,
>
> I have completed my proposal and submitted it to Google under Apache
> Software Foundation. I have attached the proposal as a PDF file with
> this mail. Can you give me a feedback on it so I can change the
> proposal before the deadline (April 6th)?
I've read through your proposal. This looks really great.
One thing you might want to expand on is the synthetic schema example and
how that might look when there are multiple namespaces involved.
For instance, given a Source[] containing:
a.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
b.xsd :: targetNamespace = n
c.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
d.xsd :: targetNamespace = m
==================================
You would need two levels of generated schemas. For example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:import schemaLocation="generated1.xsd"/>
<xs:import schemaLocation="generated2.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
generated1.xsd:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="n">
<xs:include schemaLocation="a.xsd"/>
<xs:include schemaLocation="b.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
generated2.xsd:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="m">
<xs:include schemaLocation="c.xsd"/>
<xs:include schemaLocation="d.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
> I am not sure whether others can view the images in the proposal
> which I submitted to the Google. How can I know it?
I can view the images in the proposal you submitted to Google. I assume
others would be able to as well.
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > wrote:
> Hello Shakya,
>
> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012 05:12:17
PM:
>
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
> > things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
> > resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
> > apply it in the project.
> For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a
> call out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import.
> This allows the application to resolve the location of the schema
> document in some other way than the default of opening the URL
> specified on the include/import. The includes and imports in the
> synthetic schemas you generate should resolve back to the Source
> objects that were passed to SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would
> need to create an implementation of XMLEntityResolver which handles
> this custom resolution and register it with the SchemaFactory.
>
> > I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
> > like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
> > "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
> > do you suggest for this?
> Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
>
> > I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
> > modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
> > feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is
> 6thof April).
> >
> > Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
> Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > wrote:
> > Hi Shakya,
> >
> > I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
> > working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
> > case, not a general solution.
> >
> > I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
> > documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
> > namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
> >
> > It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
> > internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
> > user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
> > perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
> > namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
> > further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
> > the namespaces together with imports.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/
> xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> Regards,
>
> Shakya Wijerama
>
> Senior Student,
> Faculty of Applied Sciences,
> Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hello Michael,
I have completed my proposal and submitted it to Google under Apache
Software Foundation. I have attached the proposal as a PDF file with this
mail. Can you give me a feedback on it so I can change the proposal before
the deadline (April 6th)?
I am not sure whether others can view the images in the proposal which I
submitted to the Google. How can I know it?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
> Hello Shakya,
>
> Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012 05:12:17
> PM:
>
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
> > things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
> > resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
> > apply it in the project.
>
> For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a call
> out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import. This allows
> the application to resolve the location of the schema document in some
> other way than the default of opening the URL specified on the
> include/import. The includes and imports in the synthetic schemas you
> generate should resolve back to the Source objects that were passed to
> SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would need to create an implementation of
> XMLEntityResolver which handles this custom resolution and register it with
> the SchemaFactory.
>
> > I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
> > like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
> > "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
> > do you suggest for this?
>
> Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
>
> > I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
> > modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
> > feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is 6thof
> April).
> >
> > Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
>
> Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich <
> mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > > wrote:
> > Hi Shakya,
> >
> > I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
> > working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
> > case, not a general solution.
> >
> > I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
> > documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
> > namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
> >
> > It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
> > internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
> > user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
> > perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
> > namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
> > further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
> > the namespaces together with imports.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1]
> http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
--
Regards,
*Shakya Wijerama*
Senior Student,
Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka.
Re: Applying for GSOC 2012 under Apache Xerces
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hello Shakya,
Shakya Wijerama <sh...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/04/2012 05:12:17
PM:
> Hello Michael,
>
> I have completed my proposal to some extent and there are a few
> things to clarify. I am not much familiar with custom entity
> resolver. Can you briefly explain me the idea of that and how we can
> apply it in the project.
For each include and import in a schema document, Xerces will make a call
out to an entity resolver [1] to locate the include or import. This allows
the application to resolve the location of the schema document in some
other way than the default of opening the URL specified on the
include/import. The includes and imports in the synthetic schemas you
generate should resolve back to the Source objects that were passed to
SchemaFactory.newSchema(). You would need to create an implementation of
XMLEntityResolver which handles this custom resolution and register it
with the SchemaFactory.
> I have used the name for the project as it is in JIRA. It is more
> like bug name and I think it is better to change the name as
> "Validating against multiple XMl schemas with same namespace". What
> do you suggest for this?
Yes, sounds much better than the JIRA bug id.
> I have not fully completed the proposal yet and there are some
> modifications to be done. So I can complete the rest with your
> feedback and submit it to Google tomorrow (since the deadline is 6thof
April).
>
> Note: I have attached the proposal herewith..
Good work so far. Looking forward to seeing your completed proposal.
> Thanks.
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> > wrote:
> Hi Shakya,
>
> I understand what Mukul is saying, but disagree that Xerces is
> working correctly. He described a work around for that specific
> case, not a general solution.
>
> I believe users should be able to provide an array of schema
> documents to SchemaFactory.newInstance() which all have the same
> namespace and that Xerces should be fixed so that it can process that.
>
> It should be possible for the SchemaFactory implementation to
> internally generate a synthetic schema document which combines the
> user's list of schema documents together. From the schema loader's
> perspective this would look like one master schema document for the
> namespace which has includes to all the others. Taking that a step
> further, another schema document could be generated which glues all
> the namespaces together with imports.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Technologies and WAS Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
Thanks.
[1]
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org