What level JDK compatibility should contributions be at?

[Eric Fixler <fi...@idiom.com>]

What JDK version Should patches/fixes/additions to the lucene source 
tree be compatible with?

thanks
eric



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Latent Semantic Analysis?

[John Caron <ca...@unidata.ucar.edu>]

Hello Lucene Developers:

I have been lurking on this list for a while, and this question is good
excuse to introduce myself. I have an implementation of LSA that I have been
planning to modify to fit into the Lucene framework Real Soon Now. I would
be interested in collaborating with others, or just hearing how it should
work and/or design thoughts.

Ive been thinking about LSA as a search algorithm; i have some other ideas
about clustering, but havent had time to test any of them.

Some details of previous LSA work are available at:

http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/caron/faqo/index.html

(in fact, if you look at the FAQO demo, you will notice that I've been
archiving this maillist since Oct, so you can try LSA out on it. PS: sorry i
dont have any real docs yet, but have a look at the online help).


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Park" <ja...@thinkalong.com>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: Latent Semantic Analysis?


> I tried googling "latent semantic lucene". Got nowhere.  Just a curiosity,
> is there a project 'out there' that is looking at adding clustering,
> perhaps using LSA to Lucene?
>
> tia
> Jack Park
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Latent Semantic Analysis?

[Jack Park <ja...@thinkalong.com>]

I tried googling "latent semantic lucene". Got nowhere.  Just a curiosity, 
is there a project 'out there' that is looking at adding clustering, 
perhaps using LSA to Lucene?

tia
Jack Park


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: What level JDK compatibility should contributions be at?

[Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>]

on 5/16/02 2:04 PM, "Brian Goetz" <br...@quiotix.com> wrote:

> The majority of sites have moved to 1.3, but the differences in coding
> between 1.2 and 1.3 are minor.  I would suggest 1.2.

+1.2

;-)

-jon


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: What level JDK compatibility should contributions be at?

[Brian Goetz <br...@quiotix.com>]

> What JDK version Should patches/fixes/additions to the lucene source 
> tree be compatible with?

The choice is between 1.2 and 1.3; 1.1 is ancient history and 1.4 is
still bleeding edge from a commercial perspective.  

The majority of sites have moved to 1.3, but the differences in coding
between 1.2 and 1.3 are minor.  I would suggest 1.2.  



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>