You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Abhijith PA <ab...@disroot.org> on 2018/09/17 15:36:37 UTC
Backporting host verification support to 5.6.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello.
The Debian LTS (jessie) have only activemq-5.6.0 in the archive. I was
wondering is it possible to backport TLS[1] feature to the 5.6.0 ?
After going through the codebase I found, none of the files that
changed for TLS support in latest release is not present in 5.6. Does
someone tried/thought about backporting, let me know :)
- --abhijith
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=DYTa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Backporting host verification support to 5.6.0
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
5.6.0 is very old and this feature (or any other feature) is not going to
be backported to a version that old.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:43 PM Abhijith PA <ab...@disroot.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello.
>
> The Debian LTS (jessie) have only activemq-5.6.0 in the archive. I was
> wondering is it possible to backport TLS[1] feature to the 5.6.0 ?
> After going through the codebase I found, none of the files that
> changed for TLS support in latest release is not present in 5.6. Does
> someone tried/thought about backporting, let me know :)
>
> - --abhijith
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE7xPqJqaY/zX9fJAuhj1N8u2cKO8FAlufyf0ACgkQhj1N8u2c
> KO9H/g//X8OqI9ortKEQ91sGqJZ4/EB9XW2DfAkwlkQdhvT3KeYAWp0my9g6dHxH
> 2a4Hu9Hv91G5AhZ1XzC41SKl6Om9tgn1E+sO+yU9E2VVYg+BzoKk+v6mYnS+9O4I
> 6mdVLZYpF2LMpL9h3qwiZJlchRceOGhp+XRR1awpFOmF/e/KYTBqoyD4C9Ot9GgB
> WNme3kZeS4NJ7LvUJ+j9dixrcoDql3nTizpJsImvQA68zi05mqqO2ROLKH8UbruR
> XovCh9cIa6tUdLEqgOXRtWS3euHzaTJAkmbiAWOWhgYaHeRE/VTc9CtJ3Olx6XYI
> 76uTLto16z8DVS7YuM3vUq7o4PtqI3yolEuBwXek3TO5kUvSItUaf3hItv9c8s9z
> Ws1sRQO+pXAFgVJl2xW+24AVUx6eAV63QDmdfk4ttLt8CeE7krrLdhmhlKquP6sw
> Mm87M47Fep3Kzs+94G2YjnaX8lplIOGbL9HtGuA8ZY0/aKmhtgqttEV0t9exRho7
> vvoHXu1LoENDT/adjx+KVb9XVUVcr1c7O2mNXV7bMNy5cG6t17KqVlYT9eLsNSbB
> hIcP48aazGoBn4OsaHlwmNPogIf120HEO8qYp88pmmxBQ2HMbiCrs9RYzqB8b/6i
> pkbz5bwR0bmAx/M08F3BB0kUTizY8iguafmY+hG0kl1AKJoxs1U=
> =DYTa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>