You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Tomoko Uchida (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/23 15:53:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-9004) Approximate nearest vector
search
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16980772#comment-16980772 ]
Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-9004 at 11/23/19 3:52 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Just for status update:
[my PoC branch|https://github.com/mocobeta/lucene-solr-mirror/tree/jira/LUCENE-9004-aknn] is still on pretty early stage and works only on one segment, but now it can index and query arbitrary vectors by [this example code|https://gist.github.com/mocobeta/5c174ee9fc6408470057a9e7d2020c45]. The newly added KnnGraphQuery is an extension of Query class so it should be able to be combined with other queries with some limitations, because the knn query cannot score entire dataset in nature. Indexing performance is terrible for now (it takes a few minutes for a hundred of thousands vectors w/ 100 dims on commodity PCs), but searching doesn't look too bad (it takes ~30 msec for the same dataset) thanks to the skip list-like graph structure.
On my current branch I wrapped {{BinaryDocValues}} to store vector values. However, exposing random access capability for doc values (or its extensions) can be controversial, so I'd like to propose a new codec which combines 1. the HNSW graph and 2. the vectors (float arrays).
The new format for each vector field would have three parts (in other words, three files in a segment). They would look like:
{code:java}
Meta data and index part:
+--------------------------------------------------+
| meta data |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| doc id | offset to first friend list for the doc |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| doc id | offset to first friend list for the doc |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| ...... |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
Graph data part:
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| friends list at layer N | friends list at layer N-1 | ...... | friends list at level 0 | <- friends lists for doc 0
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| friends list at layer N | friends list at layer N-1 | ...... | friends list at level 0 | <- friends lists for doc 1
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| ...... | <- and so on
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Vector data part:
+----------------------+
| encoded vector value | <- vector value for doc 0
+----------------------+
| encoded vector value | <- vector value for doc 1
+----------------------+
| ...... | <- and so on
+----------------------+
{code}
- "meta data" includes: number of dimensions, distance function for similarity calculation, and other field level meta data
- "doc id" is: doc ids having a vector value on this field
- "friends list at layer N" is: a delta encoded target doc id list where each target doc is connected to the doc at Nth layer
- "encoded vector value" is: a fixed length byte array. the offset of the value can be calculated on the fly. (limitations: each document can have only one vector value for each vector field)
The graph data (friends lists) is relatively small so we could keep all of them on the Java heap for fast retrieval (though some off-heap strategy might be required for very large graphs).
The vector data (vector values) is large and only the small fraction of it is needed when searching, so they should be accessed by on-demand style via the index.
Feedback is welcomed.
And I have a question about introducing new formats - is there a way to inject XXXFormat to the indexing chain so that we can add in this feature without any change on the {{lucene-core}}?
was (Author: tomoko uchida):
Just for status update:
[my PoC branch|https://github.com/mocobeta/lucene-solr-mirror/tree/jira/LUCENE-9004-aknn] is still on pretty early stage and works only on one segment, but now it can index and query arbitrary vectors by [this example code|https://gist.github.com/mocobeta/5c174ee9fc6408470057a9e7d2020c45]. The newly added KnnGraphQuery is an extension of Query class so it should be able to be combined with other queries with some limitations, because the knn query cannot score entire dataset in nature. Indexing performance is terrible for now (it takes a few minutes for a hundred of thousands vectors w/ 100 dims on commodity PCs), but searching doesn't look too bad (it takes ~30 msec for the same dataset) thanks to the skip list-like graph structure.
On my current branch I wrapped {{BinaryDocValues}} to store vector values. However, exposing random access capability for doc values (or its extensions) can be controversial, so I'd like to propose a new codec which combines 1. the HNSW graph and 2. the vectors (float arrays).
The new format for each vector field would have three parts (in other words, three files in a segment). They would look like:
{code:java}
Meta data and index part:
+--------------------------------------------------+
| meta data |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| doc id | offset to first friend list for the doc |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| doc id | offset to first friend list for the doc |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
| ...... |
+--------+-----------------------------------------+
Graph data part:
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| friends list at layer N | friends list at layer N-1 | ...... | friends list at level 0 |
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| friends list at layer N | friends list at layer N-1 | ...... | friends list at level 0 |
+-------------------------+---------------------------+---------+-------------------------+
| ...... |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Vector data part:
+----------------------+
| encoded vector value |
+----------------------+
| encoded vector value |
+----------------------+
| ...... |
+----------------------+
{code}
- "meta data" includes: number of dimensions, distance function for similarity calculation, and other field level meta data
- "doc id" is: doc ids having a vector value on this field
- "friends list at layer N" is: a delta encoded target doc id list where each target doc is connected to the doc at Nth layer
- "encoded vector value" is: a fixed length byte array. the offset of the value can be calculated on the fly. (limitations: each document can have only one vector value for each vector field)
The graph data (friends lists) is relatively small so we could keep all of them on the Java heap for fast retrieval (though some off-heap strategy might be required for very large graphs).
The vector data (vector values) is large and only the small fraction of it is needed when searching, so they should be accessed by on-demand style via the index.
Feedback is welcomed.
And I have a question about introducing new formats - is there a way to inject XXXFormat to the indexing chain so that we can add in this feature without any change on the {{lucene-core}}?
> Approximate nearest vector search
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9004
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Michael Sokolov
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: hnsw_layered_graph.png
>
>
> "Semantic" search based on machine-learned vector "embeddings" representing terms, queries and documents is becoming a must-have feature for a modern search engine. SOLR-12890 is exploring various approaches to this, including providing vector-based scoring functions. This is a spinoff issue from that.
> The idea here is to explore approximate nearest-neighbor search. Researchers have found an approach based on navigating a graph that partially encodes the nearest neighbor relation at multiple scales can provide accuracy > 95% (as compared to exact nearest neighbor calculations) at a reasonable cost. This issue will explore implementing HNSW (hierarchical navigable small-world) graphs for the purpose of approximate nearest vector search (often referred to as KNN or k-nearest-neighbor search).
> At a high level the way this algorithm works is this. First assume you have a graph that has a partial encoding of the nearest neighbor relation, with some short and some long-distance links. If this graph is built in the right way (has the hierarchical navigable small world property), then you can efficiently traverse it to find nearest neighbors (approximately) in log N time where N is the number of nodes in the graph. I believe this idea was pioneered in [1]. The great insight in that paper is that if you use the graph search algorithm to find the K nearest neighbors of a new document while indexing, and then link those neighbors (undirectedly, ie both ways) to the new document, then the graph that emerges will have the desired properties.
> The implementation I propose for Lucene is as follows. We need two new data structures to encode the vectors and the graph. We can encode vectors using a light wrapper around {{BinaryDocValues}} (we also want to encode the vector dimension and have efficient conversion from bytes to floats). For the graph we can use {{SortedNumericDocValues}} where the values we encode are the docids of the related documents. Encoding the interdocument relations using docids directly will make it relatively fast to traverse the graph since we won't need to lookup through an id-field indirection. This choice limits us to building a graph-per-segment since it would be impractical to maintain a global graph for the whole index in the face of segment merges. However graph-per-segment is a very natural at search time - we can traverse each segments' graph independently and merge results as we do today for term-based search.
> At index time, however, merging graphs is somewhat challenging. While indexing we build a graph incrementally, performing searches to construct links among neighbors. When merging segments we must construct a new graph containing elements of all the merged segments. Ideally we would somehow preserve the work done when building the initial graphs, but at least as a start I'd propose we construct a new graph from scratch when merging. The process is going to be limited, at least initially, to graphs that can fit in RAM since we require random access to the entire graph while constructing it: In order to add links bidirectionally we must continually update existing documents.
> I think we want to express this API to users as a single joint {{KnnGraphField}} abstraction that joins together the vectors and the graph as a single joint field type. Mostly it just looks like a vector-valued field, but has this graph attached to it.
> I'll push a branch with my POC and would love to hear comments. It has many nocommits, basic design is not really set, there is no Query implementation and no integration iwth IndexSearcher, but it does work by some measure using a standalone test class. I've tested with uniform random vectors and on my laptop indexed 10K documents in around 10 seconds and searched them at 95% recall (compared with exact nearest-neighbor baseline) at around 250 QPS. I haven't made any attempt to use multithreaded search for this, but it is amenable to per-segment concurrency.
> [1] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Efficient-and-robust-approximate-nearest-neighbor-Malkov-Yashunin/699a2e3b653c69aff5cf7a9923793b974f8ca164
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org