You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Dusko Jovanovski <du...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/10 12:16:20 UTC

Front page style issues

Some of the latest edits made the "What is Tapestry 5?" section on the
front page look sub-optimal.
http://tapestry.apache.org/
This is easily fixed by modifying a few css rules, can anyone with access
take a look?

Re: Front page style issues

Posted by Dusko Jovanovski <du...@gmail.com>.

Thank you for fixing it, looks good.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is fixed now. Thanks for reporting, Dusko!
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'll fix that soon, possibly tonight.
> > On Nov 10, 2014 6:19 AM, "Dusko Jovanovski" <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Some of the latest edits made the "What is Tapestry 5?" section on the
> >> front page look sub-optimal.
> >> http://tapestry.apache.org/
> >> This is easily fixed by modifying a few css rules, can anyone with
> access
> >> take a look?
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >
>

Re: Front page style issues

Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.

This is fixed now. Thanks for reporting, Dusko!

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I'll fix that soon, possibly tonight.
> On Nov 10, 2014 6:19 AM, "Dusko Jovanovski" <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Some of the latest edits made the "What is Tapestry 5?" section on the
>> front page look sub-optimal.
>> http://tapestry.apache.org/
>> This is easily fixed by modifying a few css rules, can anyone with access
>> take a look?
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>

Re: Front page style issues

Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.

Yes, I'll fix that soon, possibly tonight.
On Nov 10, 2014 6:19 AM, "Dusko Jovanovski" <du...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Some of the latest edits made the "What is Tapestry 5?" section on the
> front page look sub-optimal.
> http://tapestry.apache.org/
> This is easily fixed by modifying a few css rules, can anyone with access
> take a look?
>
>
> 
>