You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/12 08:50:42 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16974] -
JNI broken in jk2 - due to jk2_channel_jni_open()
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16974>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16974
JNI broken in jk2 - due to jk2_channel_jni_open()
remm@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
Summary|JNI broken in jk2 - due to |JNI broken in jk2 - due to
|jk2_channel_jni_open() |jk2_channel_jni_open()
------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org 2003-02-12 07:50 -------
Well, I relatively easily got JNI working with JK 2.0.2 and Tomcat 5.0.1-dev
(which should be similar to the 4.1.18), wither with Apache 2 and IIS. Of
course, you apparentl can't seem to be bothered to specify which versions you're
using, or your error logs, and choose to go on a rant instead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org