You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com> on 2007/09/26 11:51:48 UTC
Fwd: Atlassian JIRA license
moving discussion to dev as suggested by Tim it's not a private topic
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>
Date: 26.09.2007 15:24
Subject: Re: Atlassian JIRA license
To: private@harmony.apache.org
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> As far as I understand any person can download and play with demo
> version of JIRA [1].
That's what I did for HARMONY-3146.
(Mikhail: Can we move this onto dev, it is not a private discussion)
Regards,
Tim
> However, if we are talking about enabling JIRA on
> Harmony then we probably need a source code. But Atlassian doesn't
> provide source code to community and open-source licensees - see [2].
> Looks like we either need to buy it or find our own way to get sources
> - talk to Atlassian guys, tell them about Harmony and benefits of
> Harmony+JIRA bundle etc.
>
> [1] http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/JIRAEvaluationDownload!default.jspa?product=jira
> [2] http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/licensing-faq.jsp#source_code
>
> With Best Regards,
> Alexei
>
> 2007/9/26, Richard <ri...@gmail.com>:
>> Mikhail Loenko 写道:
>> What I meant is:
>>
>> I want to try run JIRA on top of Harmony myself. But I don't have JIRA
>> license
>> Can I (or someone else) use ASF license or the only way for me is to buy
>> one?
>>
>>
>> Mikhail,
>>
>> Maybe you can request an evaluation license.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mikhail
>>
>> 2007/9/25, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>>
>>
>> as I understand ASF has a license of Atlassian JIRA
>>
>> can we somehow use that license for Harmony enabling (I mean try to
>> run it on top of Harmony)?
>>
>> Not sure what you mean, you want to host a JIRA running on Harmony on
>> Apache infrastructure as a test? If not then how does Apache come into
>> this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> p.s. is this really private?
>