You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2009/02/12 16:13:47 UTC
[Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Hi,
we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no concerns with
doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally make the
move happen.
For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk (trunk10x) or if
we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean there are
no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
Trinidad 1.0.x
on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
load of patches/bugs
and the requests from the MyFaces community.
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Bernd Bohmann
<be...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I would prefer branches/trinidad-1.0.x
+1 yes.
On every release we also have a TAG, just in case...
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> Simon Lessard schrieb:
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>
>> +1 on both:
>>
>> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
>> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
>> being developed)
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there
>> were no concerns with
>> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our
>> SVN repo.
>> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like
>> to finally make the
>> > move happen.
>> >
>> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary*
>> trunk (trunk10x) or if
>> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch
>> doesn't mean there are
>> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a
>> release for
>> > Trinidad 1.0.x
>> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
>> > load of patches/bugs
>> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@googlemail.com>.
+1
I would prefer branches/trinidad-1.0.x
Regards
Bernd
Simon Lessard schrieb:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
> +1 on both:
>
> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
> being developed)
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there
> were no concerns with
> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our
> SVN repo.
> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like
> to finally make the
> > move happen.
> >
> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary*
> trunk (trunk10x) or if
> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch
> doesn't mean there are
> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a
> release for
> > Trinidad 1.0.x
> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> > load of patches/bugs
> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>
> +1 on both:
>>
>> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
>> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
>> being developed)
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
>> concerns with
>> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
>> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
>> make the
>> > move happen.
>> >
>> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
>> (trunk10x) or if
>> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
>> there are
>> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
>> > Trinidad 1.0.x
>> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
>> > load of patches/bugs
>> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
+1
2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
> +1 on both:
>
> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
> being developed)
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
> concerns with
> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
> make the
> > move happen.
> >
> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
> (trunk10x) or if
> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
> there are
> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
> > Trinidad 1.0.x
> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> > load of patches/bugs
> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
i agree with matthias - just one branch.
regards,
gerhard
2009/2/12 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
> > +1
> >
> > @andrew:
> > do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
>
> -1 :-)
>
> just one /branches/trinidad-1.0.x
>
> after every release we do a TAG.
> in case there is some (security/XSS) problem
> in, let's say Trinidad 1.0.16 we just create a
> 1.0.16.1 branch out of its TAG.
>
> -M
>
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> +1 on both:
> >>
> >> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
> >> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
> >> being developed)
> >>
> >> -Andrew
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
> >> > concerns with
> >> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
> >> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to
> finally
> >> > make the
> >> > move happen.
> >> >
> >> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
> >> > (trunk10x) or if
> >> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
> >> > there are
> >> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
> >> > Trinidad 1.0.x
> >> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> >> > load of patches/bugs
> >> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
> >> >
> >> > -Matthias
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >> >
> >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Ok,
the 1.0.x stuff is now a branch, which is located here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-1.0.x
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Jeanne Waldman
<je...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Matt Cooper wrote, On 2/12/2009 5:28 PM PT:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> @trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
> +1
>
> @andrew:
> do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
>
>
> -1 :-)
>
> just one /branches/trinidad-1.0.x
>
> after every release we do a TAG.
> in case there is some (security/XSS) problem
> in, let's say Trinidad 1.0.16 we just create a
> 1.0.16.1 branch out of its TAG.
>
> -M
>
>
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>
>
> +1 on both:
>
> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
> being developed)
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
> concerns with
> doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
> Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
> make the
> move happen.
>
> For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
> (trunk10x) or if
> we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
> there are
> no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
> Trinidad 1.0.x
> on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> load of patches/bugs
> and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Matt Cooper <mc...@apache.org>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
>> +1
>>
>> @andrew:
>> do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
>
> -1 :-)
>
> just one /branches/trinidad-1.0.x
>
> after every release we do a TAG.
> in case there is some (security/XSS) problem
> in, let's say Trinidad 1.0.16 we just create a
> 1.0.16.1 branch out of its TAG.
>
> -M
>
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> +1 on both:
>>>
>>> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
>>> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
>>> being developed)
>>>
>>> -Andrew
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
>>> > concerns with
>>> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
>>> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
>>> > make the
>>> > move happen.
>>> >
>>> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
>>> > (trunk10x) or if
>>> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
>>> > there are
>>> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
>>> > Trinidad 1.0.x
>>> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
>>> > load of patches/bugs
>>> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>>> >
>>> > -Matthias
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
> +1
>
> @andrew:
> do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
-1 :-)
just one /branches/trinidad-1.0.x
after every release we do a TAG.
in case there is some (security/XSS) problem
in, let's say Trinidad 1.0.16 we just create a
1.0.16.1 branch out of its TAG.
-M
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>>
>> +1 on both:
>>
>> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
>> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
>> being developed)
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
>> > concerns with
>> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
>> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
>> > make the
>> > move happen.
>> >
>> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
>> > (trunk10x) or if
>> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
>> > there are
>> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
>> > Trinidad 1.0.x
>> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
>> > load of patches/bugs
>> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Gerhard Petracek
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
> +1
>
> @andrew:
> do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
No, only the latest would be used, but I suppose since SVN has no
tagging support (we hack it with a branch under "tags"), that the ".x"
usage would be sufficient.
-Andrew
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
@trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
+1
@andrew:
do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
regards,
gerhard
2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
> +1 on both:
>
> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
> being developed)
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
> concerns with
> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
> make the
> > move happen.
> >
> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
> (trunk10x) or if
> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
> there are
> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
> > Trinidad 1.0.x
> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> > load of patches/bugs
> > and the requests from the MyFaces community.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.x becoming trunk ...
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 on both:
trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
being developed)
-Andrew
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no concerns with
> doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
> Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally make the
> move happen.
>
> For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk (trunk10x) or if
> we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean there are
> no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
> Trinidad 1.0.x
> on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
> load of patches/bugs
> and the requests from the MyFaces community.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>