You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> on 2007/12/20 05:23:35 UTC
Re: svn commit: r605798 - in
/incubator/cxf/trunk/distribution/src/main/release/samples/js_browser_client_java_first/src/demo/hw/server:
JavascriptExample.java JavascriptExampleImpl.java data/Ingredient.java
Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2007, 03:52 +0000 schrieb ningjiang@apache.org:
> Author: ningjiang
> Date: Wed Dec 19 19:52:48 2007
> New Revision: 605798
>
> +
> +import demo.hw.server.data.Beverage;
> +import demo.hw.server.data.Category;
> +import demo.hw.server.data.Ingredient;
> +
I'm not sure, Willem, but I don't believe our code is supposed to leave
the org.apache.cxf.xxxx package naming scheme. (org.apache.cxf.demo or
whatever should be fine instead.)
Glen
Re: svn commit: r605798 - in
/incubator/cxf/trunk/distribution/src/main/release/samples/js_browser_client_java_first/src/demo/hw/server:
JavascriptExample.java JavascriptExampleImpl.java data/Ingredient.java
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
All our demos leave that package scheme.
The problem was import ordering.
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:23 -0500, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2007, 03:52 +0000 schrieb ningjiang@apache.org:
> > Author: ningjiang
> > Date: Wed Dec 19 19:52:48 2007
> > New Revision: 605798
> >
> > +
> > +import demo.hw.server.data.Beverage;
> > +import demo.hw.server.data.Category;
> > +import demo.hw.server.data.Ingredient;
> > +
>
> I'm not sure, Willem, but I don't believe our code is supposed to leave
> the org.apache.cxf.xxxx package naming scheme. (org.apache.cxf.demo or
> whatever should be fine instead.)
>
> Glen
>