You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Andreas L Delmelle <a_...@pandora.be> on 2006/12/23 12:42:40 UTC

Re: svn commit: r489881 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_93: ./ src/documentation/ src/documentation/content/xdocs/ src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.93/ src/documentation/resources/stylesheets/

On Dec 23, 2006, at 12:33, spepping@apache.org wrote:

Hi Simon,

Seems my response to your post yesterday didn't make it to the list  
for some reason...

Anyway, this known issue

> +      <known-issue>
> +        Omitting fo:table-column or having fo:table-column without  
> a column-width
> +        and attempting to create columns implicitly from the first
> +        table row is not implemented, yet (<a href="http:// 
> issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35656">Bugzilla #35656</ 
> a>).
> +      </known-issue>

as Jeremias confirmed, has been resolved, for the largest part... The  
testcases that were enabled with the patch solving the bug are only  
basic. AFAICT, currently there is one tiny hole in the code:

<fo:table>
   <fo:table-body>
     <fo:table-cell starts-row="true" width="25mm" number-columns- 
spanned="2">
...

The current code creates two implicit columns, but does not  
distribute the cell width yet. The cell width is only used in case  
the cell spans only one column.



Cheers,

Andreas


Re: svn commit: r489881 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_93: ./ src/documentation/ src/documentation/content/xdocs/ src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.93/ src/documentation/resources/stylesheets/

Posted by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.eu>.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:42:40PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2006, at 12:33, spepping@apache.org wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Seems my response to your post yesterday didn't make it to the list  
> for some reason...

Andreas,

Your response was received but not yet processed. I try to do one
thing at a time.

Simon
 
> Anyway, this known issue
> 
> >+      <known-issue>
> >+        Omitting fo:table-column or having fo:table-column without  
> >a column-width
> >+        and attempting to create columns implicitly from the first
> >+        table row is not implemented, yet (<a href="http:// 
> >issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35656">Bugzilla #35656</ 
> >a>).
> >+      </known-issue>
> 
> as Jeremias confirmed, has been resolved, for the largest part... The  
> testcases that were enabled with the patch solving the bug are only  
> basic. AFAICT, currently there is one tiny hole in the code:
> 
> <fo:table>
>   <fo:table-body>
>     <fo:table-cell starts-row="true" width="25mm" number-columns- 
> spanned="2">
> ...
> 
> The current code creates two implicit columns, but does not  
> distribute the cell width yet. The cell width is only used in case  
> the cell spans only one column.
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andreas
> 

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu