You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Corey J. Nolet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/09/20 03:03:35 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-2837) Scanning empty table can be optimized

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Corey J. Nolet updated ACCUMULO-2837:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.6.1)
                   1.6.2

> Scanning empty table can be optimized
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2837
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>            Assignee: Keith Turner
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.6.2, 1.7.0
>
>
> I wrote an application that repeatedly scanned random rows in an empty table at one point.  It did not know the table was empty.  I was jstacking the tserver and repeatedly saw stack traces in a few places in the code. 
>  * the audit canScan method
>  * DefaultConfiguration.get
>  * Kept seeing Password token ungziping the password??????
> After fixing all of these issues (except for system token) I ran a simple test I saw times go from ~1.7s to ~1.3s for a simple test I wrote to recreate this issue.
> I am not sure how much of an impact the gziping the password has.  I was just sampling the stack traces manually.  I seems like I saw the password token gzip stack traces less frequently, but I did catch it multiple jstack calls.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)