You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/04/06 00:00:30 UTC
[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] cesarhernandezgt commented on pull request #37: TOMEE- draft improve main comparison page and fix per version comparison pages
cesarhernandezgt commented on PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/37#issuecomment-1089546923
Hi @sultan
thank you much for the draft PR, I like a lot your proposals, I have the following feedback on the draft pr:
From the first image you published, I like the structure of the following but I would reduce the number of columns and change the order:
TomEE Branch || Java SE || JakartaEE || MicroProfile
or
TomEE Branch || Java SE || JakartaEE || MicroProfile || Based on Tomcat
Why?
- The Order (left to right) focus first the attention in the "TomEE branching", then in the second most common question "What SE version should I use", and then finish with the Jakarta and Microprofile Macro platforms.
- By removing "TomEE Release" column, this table won't need manual mantainance for each TomEE minor release.
- The number of specificaiton is a long list than doesn't seems to scale find in a horizontal approach, that's why in my humble opinion the specific versions of each specification can be linked into a separated table.
> "Flavors only (version A)"
+1, I like this table since cover a perspective the table above doesn't.
There is a third table that can contain de specific version of each spec peer branch and flavor. Notice that my draft is based on the current Flavor table (https://tomee.apache.org/comparison.html).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomee.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org