You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> on 2017/05/18 08:58:19 UTC
Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be fine if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/compatibility.html.
Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether we should consider that as minimum supported version or something higher. Any thoughts?
Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize on the Java version.
-Jaikiran
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by J Pai <ja...@gmail.com>.
So far the majority seems to be to require a minimum of Java 7. If there are no concerns or objections to this by the end of this week, then on Monday, I’ll raise a PR to mandate Java 7 for Ivy.
-Jaikiran
On 18-May-2017, at 11:48 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis <g....@gmail.com> wrote:
That's fine, IvyDE is already at Java 7/Eclipse 3.7.1; then IvyDE baseline
should be bumped to Java 8/Eclipse 4.4 with the next Ivy release. Hopefully
updatesite resolver could be used then.
2017-05-18 17:12 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>:
> Using 1.7 for the next release and then 1.8 for the following release makes
> sense to me.
>
> On 18 May 2017 at 05:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Jaikiran
>> On 18-May-2017, at 4:26 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <ap...@materne.de> wrote:
>>
>> I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
>> Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
>>> An: Ant Developers List
>>> Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
>>> release
>>>
>>> The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
>>> maintenance stream.
>>> The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
>>> minimum are not too far away.
>>>
>>> Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
>>>
>>> I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
>>>
>>> I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
>>> 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
>>> then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
>>> <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
>>>> because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
>>> to
>>>> test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
>>>>
>>>> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
>>>> environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
>>> We
>>>> shouldn’t require too high.
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas
>>>>
>>>>> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
>>>>> fine
>>>> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
>>>> higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
>>>> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
>>> milestone/compatibility.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
>>>>> we
>>>> should consider that as minimum supported version or something
>>> higher.
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
>>>>> on
>>>> the Java version.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jaikiran
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
>>>> commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by Gintautas Grigelionis <g....@gmail.com>.
That's fine, IvyDE is already at Java 7/Eclipse 3.7.1; then IvyDE baseline
should be bumped to Java 8/Eclipse 4.4 with the next Ivy release. Hopefully
updatesite resolver could be used then.
2017-05-18 17:12 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>:
> Using 1.7 for the next release and then 1.8 for the following release makes
> sense to me.
>
> On 18 May 2017 at 05:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Jaikiran
> > On 18-May-2017, at 4:26 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <ap...@materne.de> wrote:
> >
> > I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
> > Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
> > > An: Ant Developers List
> > > Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
> > > release
> > >
> > > The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
> > > maintenance stream.
> > > The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> > > minimum are not too far away.
> > >
> > > Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
> > >
> > > I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
> > >
> > > I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
> > > 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
> > > then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
> > > <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> > >> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
> > >> because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
> > > to
> > >> test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
> > >>
> > >> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
> > >> environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
> > > We
> > >> shouldn’t require too high.
> > >>
> > >> Nicolas
> > >>
> > >>> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
> > >>> fine
> > >> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
> > >> higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> > >> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
> > > milestone/compatibility.html.
> > >>>
> > >>> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
> > >>> we
> > >> should consider that as minimum supported version or something
> > > higher.
> > >> Any thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
> > >>> on
> > >> the Java version.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Jaikiran
> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
> > >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
> > >> commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Using 1.7 for the next release and then 1.8 for the following release makes
sense to me.
On 18 May 2017 at 05:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Jaikiran
> On 18-May-2017, at 4:26 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <ap...@materne.de> wrote:
>
> I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
> Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...
>
> Jan
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
> > An: Ant Developers List
> > Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
> > release
> >
> > The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
> > maintenance stream.
> > The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> > minimum are not too far away.
> >
> > Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
> >
> > I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
> >
> > I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
> > 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
> > then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
> >
> > Cheers, Paul.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
> > <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
> >> because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
> > to
> >> test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
> >>
> >> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
> >> environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
> > We
> >> shouldn’t require too high.
> >>
> >> Nicolas
> >>
> >>> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
> >>> fine
> >> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
> >> higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> >> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
> > milestone/compatibility.html.
> >>>
> >>> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
> >>> we
> >> should consider that as minimum supported version or something
> > higher.
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
> >>> on
> >> the Java version.
> >>>
> >>> -Jaikiran
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
> >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
> >> commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by J Pai <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
-Jaikiran
On 18-May-2017, at 4:26 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <ap...@materne.de> wrote:
I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...
Jan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
> release
>
> The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
> maintenance stream.
> The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> minimum are not too far away.
>
> Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
>
> I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
>
> I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
> 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
> then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
> <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
>> wrote:
>
>> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
>> because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
> to
>> test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
>>
>> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
>> environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
> We
>> shouldn’t require too high.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
>>> fine
>> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
>> higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
>> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
> milestone/compatibility.html.
>>>
>>> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
>>> we
>> should consider that as minimum supported version or something
> higher.
>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
>>> on
>> the Java version.
>>>
>>> -Jaikiran
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
>> commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
AW: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" <ap...@materne.de>.
I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...
Jan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
> release
>
> The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
> maintenance stream.
> The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> minimum are not too far away.
>
> Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
>
> I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
>
> I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
> 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
> then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
> <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
> > because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
> to
> > test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
> >
> > One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
> > environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
> We
> > shouldn’t require too high.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > > Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
> > > fine
> > if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
> > higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
> milestone/compatibility.html.
> > >
> > > Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
> > > we
> > should consider that as minimum supported version or something
> higher.
> > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
> > > on
> > the Java version.
> > >
> > > -Jaikiran
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by Gintautas Grigelionis <g....@gmail.com>.
Gradle does have an Ivy plugin which wraps Ivy 2.2.0
2017-05-18 11:26 GMT+02:00 Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>:
> The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our maintenance
> stream.
> The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> minimum are not too far away.
>
> Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
>
> I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
>
> I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on 1.7/1.8
> and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd then bump the
> Ivy version and target 8.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <
> nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea, because
> > at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able to test it if
> > there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
> >
> > One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the environment
> > Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij… We shouldn’t
> > require too high.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > > Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be fine
> > if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something higher
> > than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/compatibility.html.
> > >
> > > Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether we
> > should consider that as minimum supported version or something higher.
> Any
> > thoughts?
> > >
> > > Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize on
> > the Java version.
> > >
> > > -Jaikiran
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>.
The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our maintenance
stream.
The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
minimum are not too far away.
Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on 1.7/1.8
and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd then bump the
Ivy version and target 8.
Cheers, Paul.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> wrote:
> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea, because
> at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able to test it if
> there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
>
> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the environment
> Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij… We shouldn’t
> require too high.
>
> Nicolas
>
> > Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be fine
> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something higher
> than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/compatibility.html.
> >
> > Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether we
> should consider that as minimum supported version or something higher. Any
> thoughts?
> >
> > Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize on
> the Java version.
> >
> > -Jaikiran
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Posted by Nicolas Lalevée <ni...@hibnet.org>.
I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea, because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able to test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij… We shouldn’t require too high.
Nicolas
> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be fine if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/compatibility.html.
>
> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether we should consider that as minimum supported version or something higher. Any thoughts?
>
> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize on the Java version.
>
> -Jaikiran
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org