[2.x] Spring dependency

[Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>]

In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars
is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run
Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I
believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the
PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time.
Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency?

Simon

Re: [2.x] Spring dependency

[Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>]

An artifact with "provided" scope is still required at development time 
including the maven compilation or eclipse classpath. The side effect is 
that the artifact will be excluded from the transitive dependencies. It's 
probably better just use the "compile" scope and leave the exclusion to the 
packaging plugins such as the war plugin or assembly plugin if we don't want 
to have the artifact shipped.

+1 to change the scope to "compile".

Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Laws" <si...@googlemail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:14 AM
To: "tuscany-dev" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: [2.x] Spring dependency

> In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars
> is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run
> Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I
> believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the
> PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time.
> Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency?
>
> Simon 

Re: [2.x] Spring dependency

[Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>]

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we do want to ship the Spring jars as part of the Tuscany
> distribution. Simon was saying the same thing.
>
> Raymond
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Mike Edwards" <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 11:20 AM
> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [2.x] Spring dependency
>
>> Simon Laws wrote:
>>>
>>> In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars
>>> is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run
>>> Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I
>>> believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the
>>> PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time.
>>> Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency?
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Why don't we want to ship the Spring classes, so that we have a single
>> package that the end user can install?  It is a pain having to fetch
>> separate downloads from lots of different places.
>>
>>
>> Yours,  Mike.
>
>
Yep, I was saying we should ship the Jars. I'll commit the change.

Simon

Re: [2.x] Spring dependency

[Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>]

I think we do want to ship the Spring jars as part of the Tuscany 
distribution. Simon was saying the same thing.

Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Edwards" <mi...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 11:20 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [2.x] Spring dependency

> Simon Laws wrote:
>> In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars
>> is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run
>> Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I
>> believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the
>> PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time.
>> Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency?
>>
>> Simon
>>
> Folks,
>
> Why don't we want to ship the Spring classes, so that we have a single 
> package that the end user can install?  It is a pain having to fetch 
> separate downloads from lots of different places.
>
>
> Yours,  Mike. 

Re: [2.x] Spring dependency

[Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>]

Simon Laws wrote:
> In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars
> is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run
> Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I
> believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the
> PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time.
> Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency?
> 
> Simon
> 
Folks,

Why don't we want to ship the Spring classes, so that we have a single package that the end user can 
install?  It is a pain having to fetch separate downloads from lots of different places.


Yours,  Mike.