[DISCUSS] drop 5.0.0 label for JIRAs

[James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>]

Given that 5.0.0 is not imminent and everything from the 4.x release will
appear in it, I propose that we no longer label our JIRAs with 5.0.0 in the
fixVersion field. We can continue to use 4.4.1 and 4.5.0 as an indicate for
the target release of the fix.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
James

Re: [DISCUSS] drop 5.0.0 label for JIRAs

[Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>]

Sorry if this has already been resolved, I'm just getting back from an
extended absence.

I'm +1 for this as well. Can we remove 5.0.0 label from JIRA as well?
Presumably there's nothing with just the 5.0.0 label, so a simple removal
should suffice. I haven't checked though...

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Josh Mahonin <jm...@interset.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> I think the version / branching system is pretty confusing. Any steps to
> minimize that sound good to me.
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:55 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Given that 5.0.0 is not imminent and everything from the 4.x release will
> > appear in it, I propose that we no longer label our JIRAs with 5.0.0 in
> the
> > fixVersion field. We can continue to use 4.4.1 and 4.5.0 as an indicate
> for
> > the target release of the fix.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] drop 5.0.0 label for JIRAs

[Josh Mahonin <jm...@interset.com>]

+1

I think the version / branching system is pretty confusing. Any steps to
minimize that sound good to me.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:55 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> Given that 5.0.0 is not imminent and everything from the 4.x release will
> appear in it, I propose that we no longer label our JIRAs with 5.0.0 in the
> fixVersion field. We can continue to use 4.4.1 and 4.5.0 as an indicate for
> the target release of the fix.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>