You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2005/09/21 22:24:15 UTC
Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> Hey Geoff, shouldn't the apache2-rename-unstable branch be nuked?
>
> I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on
> the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok svn
> better than I do.
I don't think it has anything to do with the understanding of svn. It's
just that if something is dead why keeping it around? All the changes from
that branch were merged into the trunk anyway, so it doesn't have any
extra value besides the painful memories.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://mailchannels.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch
Posted by "Philip M. Gollucci" <pg...@p6m7g8.com>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
>> I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on
>> the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok
>> svn better than I do.
I see no point to keeping it.
libapreq2 actually had a similiar branch, and swapped it directly in for trunk rather then merging it back in.
--
END
------------------------------------------------------------
What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger.
Nothing is impossible.
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/
Senior Developer / Liquidity Services, Inc.
http://www.liquidityservicesinc.com
http://www.liquidation.com
http://www.uksurplus.com
http://www.govliquidation.com
http://www.gowholesale.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch
Posted by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>.
> Exactly, once a branch has outlived it's usefuleness, there is nothing wrong
> with:
>
> $> svn delete -m'Merged successfully to trunk/' \
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/branches/apache2-rename-unstable/
+1
--Geoff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>
>>>Stas Bekman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hey Geoff, shouldn't the apache2-rename-unstable branch be nuked?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on
>>>the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok
>>>svn better than I do.
>>
>>I don't think it has anything to do with the understanding of svn. It's
>>just that if something is dead why keeping it around? All the changes
>>from that branch were merged into the trunk anyway, so it doesn't have
>>any extra value besides the painful memories.
>
>
> Exactly, once a branch has outlived it's usefuleness, there is nothing wrong
> with:
>
> $> svn delete -m'Merged successfully to trunk/' \
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/branches/apache2-rename-unstable/
it's gone.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://mailchannels.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch
Posted by "Philippe M. Chiasson" <go...@ectoplasm.org>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>> Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Geoff, shouldn't the apache2-rename-unstable branch be nuked?
>>
>> I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on
>> the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok
>> svn better than I do.
>
> I don't think it has anything to do with the understanding of svn. It's
> just that if something is dead why keeping it around? All the changes
> from that branch were merged into the trunk anyway, so it doesn't have
> any extra value besides the painful memories.
Exactly, once a branch has outlived it's usefuleness, there is nothing wrong
with:
$> svn delete -m'Merged successfully to trunk/' \
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/branches/apache2-rename-unstable/
--
Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5