You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs-cvs@perl.apache.org by pe...@apache.org on 2002/07/01 11:08:03 UTC
cvs commit: modperl-docs TODO
pereinar 2002/07/01 02:08:03
Modified: . TODO
Log:
??? -> date during site migration.
Revision Changes Path
1.74 +3 -1 modperl-docs/TODO
Index: TODO
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-docs/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -r1.73 -r1.74
--- TODO 30 Jun 2002 18:24:08 -0000 1.73
+++ TODO 1 Jul 2002 09:08:02 -0000 1.74
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
- get Apache team to link to correct place at
http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
+- set all "???" in Changes to the correct date.
+
====================================================================
Later:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-cvs-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-cvs-help@perl.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: modperl-docs TODO
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 12:22 01.07.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> pereinar@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> pereinar 2002/07/01 02:08:03
>>> Modified: . TODO
>>> Log:
>>> ??? -> date during site migration.
>>>
>>> Revision Changes Path
>>> 1.74 +3 -1 modperl-docs/TODO
>>>
>>> Index: TODO
>>> ===================================================================
>>> RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-docs/TODO,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.73
>>> retrieving revision 1.74
>>> diff -u -r1.73 -r1.74
>>> --- TODO 30 Jun 2002 18:24:08 -0000 1.73
>>> +++ TODO 1 Jul 2002 09:08:02 -0000 1.74
>>> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
>>> - get Apache team to link to correct place at
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
>>>
>>> +- set all "???" in Changes to the correct date.
>>> +
>>> ====================================================================
>>
>>
>> not sure about this one, one on side the moment you "fix" it you need
>> to start a new section with "???" again, so what's the gain?
>>
>> the shifting date is there so we don't have to create gazillions
>> timestamps. Simply close the Changes section when you feel like it
>> (e.g. after 3-4 months of changes, if there are just a few, or when
>> there are many changes), but the above TODO entry seems to be like a
>> bad idea to me.
>
>
> Well, we do have to have milestones at *some* points. And atleast when
> we close them down at release time, there won't be any "???" for a
> moment, until the next set of changes.
Sure, but then we immediately start a new ??? placeholder, even if we
don't have any new changes, just so when you add a change you never have
to remember about the header. This is like always finishing a list with
',', so you don't have to remember to add it when adding a new item.
> Generally though, I wish we had a better solution than undefined
> timestamps.
you are most welcome to come up with better ideas :)
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: modperl-docs TODO
Posted by Per Einar Ellefsen <pe...@skynet.be>.
At 12:22 01.07.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>pereinar@apache.org wrote:
>>pereinar 2002/07/01 02:08:03
>> Modified: . TODO
>> Log:
>> ??? -> date during site migration.
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.74 +3 -1 modperl-docs/TODO
>>
>> Index: TODO
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-docs/TODO,v
>> retrieving revision 1.73
>> retrieving revision 1.74
>> diff -u -r1.73 -r1.74
>> --- TODO 30 Jun 2002 18:24:08 -0000 1.73
>> +++ TODO 1 Jul 2002 09:08:02 -0000 1.74
>> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
>> - get Apache team to link to correct place at
>> http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
>>
>> +- set all "???" in Changes to the correct date.
>> +
>> ====================================================================
>
>not sure about this one, one on side the moment you "fix" it you need to
>start a new section with "???" again, so what's the gain?
>
>the shifting date is there so we don't have to create gazillions
>timestamps. Simply close the Changes section when you feel like it (e.g.
>after 3-4 months of changes, if there are just a few, or when there are
>many changes), but the above TODO entry seems to be like a bad idea to me.
Well, we do have to have milestones at *some* points. And atleast when we
close them down at release time, there won't be any "???" for a moment,
until the next set of changes.
Generally though, I wish we had a better solution than undefined timestamps.
--
Per Einar Ellefsen
per.einar@skynet.be
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: modperl-docs TODO
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
pereinar@apache.org wrote:
> pereinar 2002/07/01 02:08:03
>
> Modified: . TODO
> Log:
> ??? -> date during site migration.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.74 +3 -1 modperl-docs/TODO
>
> Index: TODO
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-docs/TODO,v
> retrieving revision 1.73
> retrieving revision 1.74
> diff -u -r1.73 -r1.74
> --- TODO 30 Jun 2002 18:24:08 -0000 1.73
> +++ TODO 1 Jul 2002 09:08:02 -0000 1.74
> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
> - get Apache team to link to correct place at
> http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
>
> +- set all "???" in Changes to the correct date.
> +
> ====================================================================
not sure about this one, one on side the moment you "fix" it you need to
start a new section with "???" again, so what's the gain?
the shifting date is there so we don't have to create gazillions
timestamps. Simply close the Changes section when you feel like it (e.g.
after 3-4 months of changes, if there are just a few, or when there are
many changes), but the above TODO entry seems to be like a bad idea to me.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org