You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Jiatao Tao (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/08/04 13:32:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-2798) Optimizer should remove ORDER BY in sub-query, provided it has no LIMIT or OFFSET

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17170798#comment-17170798 ] 

Jiatao Tao commented on CALCITE-2798:
-------------------------------------

Can Calcite keep the info in the plan? How it executed is by engine, but we should know this in plan.

> Optimizer should remove ORDER BY in sub-query, provided it has no LIMIT or OFFSET
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2798
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.18.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.19.0
>
>
> The following SQL performs sort twice, however inner sort can be eliminated
> {code}select * from (
>   select * from "emps" 
> order by "emps"."deptno"
> ) order by 1 desc{code}
> The same goes for (window calculation will sort on its own)
> {code}select row_number() over (order by "emps"."deptno")  from (
>   select * from "emps" 
> order by "emps"."deptno" desc
> ){code}
> The same goes for SetOp (union, minus):
> {code}select * from (
>   select * from "emps" 
> order by "emps"."deptno"
> ) union select * from (
>   select * from "emps" 
> order by "emps"."deptno" desc
> ){code}
> There might be other cases like that (e.g. Aggregate, Join, Exchange, SortExchange)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)