You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2014/01/26 15:11:10 UTC
targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Hi folks!
We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already.
I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already).
Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
LieGrue,
strub
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2014-01-26 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> +1 while the 1.2.2 is not forgotten, thanks Mark!
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-01-26 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
> >> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> >> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> >> already).
> >> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
> >
> > +1
>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2014-01-26 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> +1 while the 1.2.2 is not forgotten, thanks Mark!
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-01-26 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
> >> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> >> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> >> already).
> >> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
> >
> > +1
>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 while the 1.2.2 is not forgotten, thanks Mark!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-01-26 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
>> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
>> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
>> already).
>> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
>
> +1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 while the 1.2.2 is not forgotten, thanks Mark!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-01-26 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
>> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
>> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
>> already).
>> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
>
> +1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> already).
> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
+1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> already).
> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
+1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in
> November already.
> I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
>
> I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> already).
> Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
> <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.1.x/>
>
>
>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 romain
2014-01-27 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> +1 on the major for each spec version (like tomcat) is fine for me and
> avoid confusion with technical changes for the spec targeted spec
> version (1.1, 1.2 owb versions for instance)
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-01-27 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> > Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons.
> > If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major
> version nr according the semantic versioning rules.
> >
> > We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x,
> 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this.
> >
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg <
> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for that
> >>
> >>
> >>But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed
> that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion?
> >>My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0
> implement CDI 2.0.
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Arne
> >>
> >>
> >>Von: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <
> user@openwebbeans.apache.org>, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11
> >>An: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>, openwebbeans-user <
> user@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >>Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi folks!
> >>
> >>We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in
> November already.
> >>I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this
> forward.
> >>
> >>I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our
> trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November
> already).
> >>Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
> >>
> >>LieGrue,
> >>strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 on the major for each spec version (like tomcat) is fine for me and
avoid confusion with technical changes for the spec targeted spec
version (1.1, 1.2 owb versions for instance)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-01-27 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons.
> If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major version nr according the semantic versioning rules.
>
> We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de> wrote:
>
> +1 for that
>>
>>
>>But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion?
>>My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Arne
>>
>>
>>Von: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11
>>An: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>, openwebbeans-user <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>>Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi folks!
>>
>>We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already.
>>I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
>>
>>I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already).
>>Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
>>
>>LieGrue,
>>strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons.
If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major version nr according the semantic versioning rules.
We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this.
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de> wrote:
+1 for that
>
>
>But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion?
>My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0.
>
>
>Regards,
>Arne
>
>
>Von: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11
>An: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>, openwebbeans-user <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
>
>
>
>Hi folks!
>
>We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already.
>I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
>
>I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already).
>Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
>
>LieGrue,
>strub
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.
+1 for that
But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion?
My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0.
Regards,
Arne
Von: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>>
Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org<ma...@openwebbeans.apache.org>" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>>
Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11
An: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>, openwebbeans-user <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Hi folks!
We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already.
I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already).
Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
LieGrue,
strub
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.1.x/>
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.
+1 for that
But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion?
My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0.
Regards,
Arne
Von: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>>
Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org<ma...@openwebbeans.apache.org>" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>>
Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11
An: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>, openwebbeans-user <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Hi folks!
We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already.
I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward.
I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already).
Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch.
LieGrue,
strub
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.1.x/>