You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Andreas Ländle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/08 18:03:34 UTC

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-229) Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds

Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds
-----------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: AMQNET-229
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-229
             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
          Issue Type: Wish
          Components: NMS, Stomp
    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
         Environment: .Net CF 2.0
            Reporter: Andreas Ländle
            Assignee: Jim Gomes


Please sign the compact framework assemblies in official builds so that the can be used without problems in signed projects.
I can't see any reason why the assemblies in the netcf-2.0-framework-configuration aren't signed with a strong name key ("<property name="current.build.framework.sign" value="false" />") - is there any reason?

Let me know if you need more information.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (AMQNET-229) Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds

Posted by "Jim Gomes (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jim Gomes resolved AMQNET-229.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.3.0

Added signing to .NET Compact Framework builds.

> Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-229
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: NMS, Stomp
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>         Environment: .Net CF 2.0
>            Reporter: Andreas Ländle
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Please sign the compact framework assemblies in official builds so that the can be used without problems in signed projects.
> I can't see any reason why the assemblies in the netcf-2.0-framework-configuration aren't signed with a strong name key ("<property name="current.build.framework.sign" value="false" />") - is there any reason?
> Let me know if you need more information.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-229) Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds

Posted by "Andreas Ländle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andreas Ländle updated AMQNET-229:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: SignCfAssemblies_svn907773mergedInto12xBranches.patch

For those who are interested in a patch for the 1.2.x branches.
(I only merged svn#907773 into the corresponding 1.2.x branches - no further code changes!).

> Please sign compact framework assemblies in official builds
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-229
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: NMS, Stomp
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>         Environment: .Net CF 2.0
>            Reporter: Andreas Ländle
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>         Attachments: SignCfAssemblies_svn907773mergedInto12xBranches.patch
>
>
> Please sign the compact framework assemblies in official builds so that the can be used without problems in signed projects.
> I can't see any reason why the assemblies in the netcf-2.0-framework-configuration aren't signed with a strong name key ("<property name="current.build.framework.sign" value="false" />") - is there any reason?
> Let me know if you need more information.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.