You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/17 02:03:58 UTC

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-1744) Thrift server to match the new java api.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12756294#action_12756294 ] 

Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-1744:
--------------------------------------

Note:  Changes to thrift in trunk introduced by HBASE-1822

> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1744
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thrift
>            Reporter: Tim Sell
>            Assignee: Tim Sell
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
>   1:Bytes family,
>   2:Bytes qualifier,
>   3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
>   1:Bytes row,
>   2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc  than if the columns in TPut were just map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.