You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Dan Fabulich <da...@fabulich.com> on 2007/12/09 07:17:25 UTC
Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade
I just posted a long e-mail to surefire-dev about my findings re: Surefire
2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade. I won't repost it here, but here's the summary:
Summary: I think we're ready to release 2.3.1, because I can't reproduce
"regression" SUREFIRE-347, the only bug targeted for 2.3.1. I was able to
reproduce a related bug SUREFIRE-334, and was able to fix it using
maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT (even though MSHADE-9 isn't fixed
yet). If we go ahead and release maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT, we
can release Surefire 2.4 as well (or instead).
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-surefire-dev/200712.mbox/%3cPine.WNT.4.64.0712081920200.3520@sfeng02.rf.lan%3e
http://tinyurl.com/26ubr9
-Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Monday 10 December 2007, Mauro Talevi wrote:
> Dan Fabulich wrote:
> > I just posted a long e-mail to surefire-dev about my findings re:
> > Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade. I won't repost it here, but here's
> > the summary:
> >
> > Summary: I think we're ready to release 2.3.1, because I can't
> > reproduce "regression" SUREFIRE-347, the only bug targeted for
> > 2.3.1. I was able to reproduce a related bug SUREFIRE-334, and was
> > able to fix it using maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT (even
> > though MSHADE-9 isn't fixed yet). If we go ahead and release
> > maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT, we can release Surefire 2.4 as
> > well (or instead).
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I'll release alpha-14 later today, unless somebody has any objections.
>
No objections from me. I could use it for CXF as well as we don't use
any of the relocation things that are part of MSHADE-9. :-)
Seriously, I'd like to see alpha-14 go out ASAP and then a beta-1 go out
once MSHADE-9 is fixed. (and maybe MSHADE-6 and MSHADE-8)
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade
Posted by Mauro Talevi <ma...@aquilonia.org>.
Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> I just posted a long e-mail to surefire-dev about my findings re:
> Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade. I won't repost it here, but here's the
> summary:
>
> Summary: I think we're ready to release 2.3.1, because I can't reproduce
> "regression" SUREFIRE-347, the only bug targeted for 2.3.1. I was able
> to reproduce a related bug SUREFIRE-334, and was able to fix it using
> maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT (even though MSHADE-9 isn't fixed
> yet). If we go ahead and release maven-shade-plugin alpha-14-SNAPSHOT,
> we can release Surefire 2.4 as well (or instead).
>
Hi Dan,
I'll release alpha-14 later today, unless somebody has any objections.
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org