You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by Jacov Koren <Ja...@commtouch.com> on 2012/06/25 11:23:17 UTC
ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Does anyone know if a similar test was made in ATS?
Thanks,
Jacob
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/26/12 3:17 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
>>> Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test
>>> cases it failed or passed.
>>>
>>> Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
>> Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
> We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named Co-Advisor.
> …maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
>
>
Yeah, that's fine. They just don't want the full report to be published.
In fact, I filed a number of bugs back then, and fixed a bunch of them.
But, maybe during OSCON, we'll have amc go through all the issues
reported, and file bugs for all of them, with a "coad" tag. :)
-- Leif
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/26/12 3:17 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
>>> Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test
>>> cases it failed or passed.
>>>
>>> Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
>> Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
> We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named Co-Advisor.
> …maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
>
>
Yeah, that's fine. They just don't want the full report to be published.
In fact, I filed a number of bugs back then, and fixed a bunch of them.
But, maybe during OSCON, we'll have amc go through all the issues
reported, and file bugs for all of them, with a "coad" tag. :)
-- Leif
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> > > Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular
> > > test
> > > cases it failed or passed.
> > >
> > > Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
> >
> > Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
>
> We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named
> Co-Advisor.
> …maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
The deps on this bug are all filed against mod_proxy by Co-Advisor:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43454
> > -- Leif
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> > > Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular
> > > test
> > > cases it failed or passed.
> > >
> > > Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
> >
> > Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
>
> We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named
> Co-Advisor.
> …maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
The deps on this bug are all filed against mod_proxy by Co-Advisor:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43454
> > -- Leif
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
> On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> > Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test
> > cases it failed or passed.
> >
> > Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
>
> Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named Co-Advisor.
…maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
> -- Leif
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
> On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> > Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test
> > cases it failed or passed.
> >
> > Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
>
> Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
We have a couple of bugs filed against httpd by a user named Co-Advisor.
…maybe that's what we should've done too. Perhaps less obviously, ;)
> -- Leif
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test cases it failed or passed.
>
> Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
-- Leif
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/25/12 8:08 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test cases it failed or passed.
>
> Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
Unfortunately no, we're not allowed to publish the report.
-- Leif
RE: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Jacov Koren <Ja...@commtouch.com>.
Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test cases it failed or passed.
Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zwoop@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:04 PM
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: Jacov Koren; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
On 6/25/12 3:23 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Does anyone know if a similar test was made in ATS?
>
3.0.0 and 3.2.0 score almost identical on CoAdvisor, about 70%. That number is not particularly useful, since it's more interesting to examine each and every individual test, to see where it really matters.
But, 70% is a fairly good number.
Maybe we need to make a goal for 3.4.0 to hit 90% :).
-- Leif
RE: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Jacov Koren <Ja...@commtouch.com>.
Thanks, but it is more interesting to know in which particular test cases it failed or passed.
Do you have some kind of report like the one published for squid?
-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zwoop@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:04 PM
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: Jacov Koren; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
On 6/25/12 3:23 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Does anyone know if a similar test was made in ATS?
>
3.0.0 and 3.2.0 score almost identical on CoAdvisor, about 70%. That number is not particularly useful, since it's more interesting to examine each and every individual test, to see where it really matters.
But, 70% is a fairly good number.
Maybe we need to make a goal for 3.4.0 to hit 90% :).
-- Leif
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/25/12 3:23 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Does anyone know if a similar test was made in ATS?
>
3.0.0 and 3.2.0 score almost identical on CoAdvisor, about 70%. That
number is not particularly useful, since it's more interesting to
examine each and every individual test, to see where it really matters.
But, 70% is a fairly good number.
Maybe we need to make a goal for 3.4.0 to hit 90% :).
-- Leif
Re: ATS http/1.1 compliancy test
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 6/25/12 3:23 AM, Jacov Koren wrote:
> Does anyone know if a similar test was made in ATS?
>
3.0.0 and 3.2.0 score almost identical on CoAdvisor, about 70%. That
number is not particularly useful, since it's more interesting to
examine each and every individual test, to see where it really matters.
But, 70% is a fairly good number.
Maybe we need to make a goal for 3.4.0 to hit 90% :).
-- Leif