You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/19 21:50:33 UTC
Re: Getting Ready To Release 2.5.0
Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like
to get this into 2.5.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
> chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar
> enough with JPA to know what is wrong...
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data model is
>> in that review entry?
>>
>> I can try it out.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
>>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
>>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
>>>
>>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time to
>>> > finish it =(
>>> >
>>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > - Henry
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the
>>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
>>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from James
>>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I think
>>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should apply
>>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if there
>>> >> are differences between the two.
>>> >>
>>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
>>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
>>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>>> >> [3]
>>> >>
>>> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
>>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. Mostly the
>>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are introduced
>>> or
>>> >> > have name changes.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue and
>>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Henr
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
>>> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard work)
>>> and
>>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for a
>>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past few weeks
>>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know there
>>> are
>>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and what is
>>> in
>>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
>>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. If
>>> everyone
>>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 release
>>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > -Ryan
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>>
Re: Getting Ready To Release 2.5.0
Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>.
I don't think so. I get test failures in that project not compile
errors. Although I just checked in changes for the compiler level to
move it to 1.6 so you might want to update and try again.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm I got compile erro when tried to run mvn clean test in java/samples dir:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:testCompile
> (default-testCompile) on project shindig-samples: Compilation failure
> [ERROR]
> /Users/hsaputra/shindig/trunk/java/samples/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/jpa/spi/integration/JpaRestfulTestConfigHelper.java:[83,11]
> cannot find symbol
> [ERROR] symbol : method setJSONPAllowed(boolean)
> [ERROR] location: class org.apache.shindig.protocol.DataServiceServlet
> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
>
> Is this the same error?
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Not really a blocker in my opinion, but I felt like we were close to
>> getting it in so I would at least try to make the effort ;)
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it.
>> >
>> > I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Henry
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like
>> >> to get this into 2.5.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
>> >> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar
>> >> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong...
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data
>> model
>> >> is
>> >> >> in that review entry?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can try it out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Henry
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
>> >> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
>> >> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> >> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have
>> time
>> >> to
>> >> >>> > finish it =(
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > - Henry
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <
>> rbaxter85@apache.org>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the
>> >> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to
>> few
>> >> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from
>> >> James
>> >> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I
>> think
>> >> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should
>> apply
>> >> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if
>> >> there
>> >> >>> >> are differences between the two.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in
>> the
>> >> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
>> >> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>> >> >>> >> [3]
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >> >>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences.
>> >> Mostly the
>> >> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are
>> >> introduced
>> >> >>> or
>> >> >>> >> > have name changes.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long
>> overdue
>> >> and
>> >> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Henr
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
>> >> >>> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard
>> >> work)
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready
>> for
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past
>> few
>> >> weeks
>> >> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know
>> >> there
>> >> >>> are
>> >> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and
>> >> what is
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
>> >> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume.
>> If
>> >> >>> everyone
>> >> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0
>> >> release
>> >> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> > -Ryan
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>>
Re: Getting Ready To Release 2.5.0
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hmm I got compile erro when tried to run mvn clean test in java/samples dir:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:testCompile
(default-testCompile) on project shindig-samples: Compilation failure
[ERROR]
/Users/hsaputra/shindig/trunk/java/samples/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/jpa/spi/integration/JpaRestfulTestConfigHelper.java:[83,11]
cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol : method setJSONPAllowed(boolean)
[ERROR] location: class org.apache.shindig.protocol.DataServiceServlet
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
Is this the same error?
- Henry
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not really a blocker in my opinion, but I felt like we were close to
> getting it in so I would at least try to make the effort ;)
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it.
> >
> > I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today.
> >
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like
> >> to get this into 2.5.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
> >> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar
> >> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong...
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data
> model
> >> is
> >> >> in that review entry?
> >> >>
> >> >> I can try it out.
> >> >>
> >> >> - Henry
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
> >> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
> >> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <
> >> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have
> time
> >> to
> >> >>> > finish it =(
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > - Henry
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <
> rbaxter85@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the
> >> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to
> few
> >> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from
> >> James
> >> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I
> think
> >> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should
> apply
> >> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if
> >> there
> >> >>> >> are differences between the two.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in
> the
> >> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
> >> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
> >> >>> >> [3]
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
> >> >>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences.
> >> Mostly the
> >> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are
> >> introduced
> >> >>> or
> >> >>> >> > have name changes.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long
> overdue
> >> and
> >> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Thanks,
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Henr
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
> >> >>> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >wrote:
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard
> >> work)
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready
> for
> >> a
> >> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past
> few
> >> weeks
> >> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know
> >> there
> >> >>> are
> >> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and
> >> what is
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
> >> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume.
> If
> >> >>> everyone
> >> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0
> >> release
> >> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> > -Ryan
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
>
Re: Getting Ready To Release 2.5.0
Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>.
Not really a blocker in my opinion, but I felt like we were close to
getting it in so I would at least try to make the effort ;)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it.
>
> I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today.
>
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like
>> to get this into 2.5.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
>> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar
>> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong...
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data model
>> is
>> >> in that review entry?
>> >>
>> >> I can try it out.
>> >>
>> >> - Henry
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
>> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
>> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time
>> to
>> >>> > finish it =(
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > - Henry
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the
>> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
>> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from
>> James
>> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I think
>> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should apply
>> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if
>> there
>> >>> >> are differences between the two.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
>> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
>> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>> >>> >> [3]
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences.
>> Mostly the
>> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are
>> introduced
>> >>> or
>> >>> >> > have name changes.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue
>> and
>> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Thanks,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Henr
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
>> >>> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard
>> work)
>> >>> and
>> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for
>> a
>> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past few
>> weeks
>> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know
>> there
>> >>> are
>> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and
>> what is
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
>> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. If
>> >>> everyone
>> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0
>> release
>> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> > -Ryan
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>>
Re: Getting Ready To Release 2.5.0
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it.
I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today.
- Henry
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like
> to get this into 2.5.
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar
> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong...
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data model
> is
> >> in that review entry?
> >>
> >> I can try it out.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time
> to
> >>> > finish it =(
> >>> >
> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > - Henry
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the
> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from
> James
> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I think
> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should apply
> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if
> there
> >>> >> are differences between the two.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
> >>> >> [3]
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
> >>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences.
> Mostly the
> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are
> introduced
> >>> or
> >>> >> > have name changes.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue
> and
> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Thanks,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Henr
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
> >>> m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
> >>> >> >wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard
> work)
> >>> and
> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for
> a
> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past few
> weeks
> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know
> there
> >>> are
> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and
> what is
> >>> in
> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. If
> >>> everyone
> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0
> release
> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> > -Ryan
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
>