You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com> on 2008/06/03 20:52:47 UTC
FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not float over
the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or something that
was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to get the
same results that 0.94 returns?
Thank you all for your help.
zach
-------------------EXAMPLE.fo---------------------------------------
<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<fo:layout-master-set>
<fo:simple-page-master master-name="only">
<fo:region-body region-name="xsl-region-body" margin="0.7in"
column-count="2"/>
<fo:region-before region-name="xsl-region-before" extent="0.7in"
display-align="before"/>
<fo:region-after region-name="xsl-region-after"
display-align="after" extent="0.7in"/>
</fo:simple-page-master>
</fo:layout-master-set>
<fo:page-sequence master-reference="only">
<fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
<fo:block>
This should not have any line floating over it!This should not have any
line floating over it!This should not have any line floating over it!This
should not have any line floating over it!
</fo:block>
<fo:block padding-top="0.5cm" padding-bottom="0.5cm" span="all">
This should not have any line floating over it!This should not have any
line floating over it!This should not have any line floating over
it!<fo:block />
</fo:block>
<fo:block-container absolute-position="absolute" left="9.3cm" top="auto"
reference-orientation="90">
<fo:block width="100%" line-height="1pt" background-color="black"
height="1pt"> </fo:block>
</fo:block-container>
</fo:flow>
</fo:page-sequence>
</fo:root>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17630414.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com>.
This is what occurs when i try to build using ant v1.7
=====================================
[root fop95]# ant
/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find xml-commons-apis Java
extension for this JVM
/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Some specified jars were not found
Buildfile: build.xml
init-avail:
[echo] ------------------- Apache FOP 0.95beta [1999-2008]
----------------
[echo] See build.properties and build-local.properties for additional
build settings
[echo] Apache Ant version 1.7.0 compiled on June 5 2008
[echo] VM: 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51), Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
[echo] JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOME}
[echo] JAI Support NOT Present
[echo] JCE Support PRESENT
[echo] JUnit Support NOT Present - Committers are required to have
JUnit working
[echo] XMLUnit Support NOT Present - you can get it from
http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net
init:
codegen:
[echo] Generating the java files from xml resources
[xslt] java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison not found in
gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar,file:/usr/share/java/ant-launcher.jar,file:/usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar,file:/usr/lib/jvm/java/lib/tools.jar],
parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}}
[xslt] at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.loadClass(XSLTProcess.java:548)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.resolveProcessor(XSLTProcess.java:533)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.getLiaison(XSLTProcess.java:789)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:300)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:294)
[xslt] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(libgcj.so.7)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:105)
[xslt] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:364)
[xslt] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:358)
[xslt] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:390)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1330)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1299)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecutor.java:48)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1183)
[xslt] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:702)
[xslt] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:200)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:268)
[xslt] at
org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:104)
BUILD FAILED
/home/fop95/build.xml:297: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison not found in
gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar,file:/usr/share/java/ant-launcher.jar,file:/usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar,file:/usr/lib/jvm/java/lib/tools.jar],
parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}}
_zachary_ wrote:
>
> Sounds good, I'll just wait, I was having trouble building from src. Do
> you have an estimated time of when that will be released?
>
>
>
> Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2008, at 17:31, _zachary_ wrote:
>>
>>> Sweet thank you, so can i download the binary from somewhere or do
>>> i have to
>>> do a checkout from the svn repo?
>>
>> If you want to try it out immediately, you'll need to check out from
>> the svn repo, and build the binary yourself (proverbial piece-of-cake
>> if you already have Ant installed).
>>
>> Otherwise, you'll need to wait some for 0.95 final (to be released soon)
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17809416.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by Andreas Delmelle <an...@telenet.be>.
On Jun 9, 2008, at 17:34, _zachary_ wrote:
>
> Sounds good, I'll just wait, I was having trouble building from
> src. Do you
> have an estimated time of when that will be released?
It's supposed to be soon, but there is no exact date set yet.
Can you elaborate on the trouble you encountered? We might be able to
help you out there.
Cheers
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com>.
Sounds good, I'll just wait, I was having trouble building from src. Do you
have an estimated time of when that will be released?
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2008, at 17:31, _zachary_ wrote:
>
>> Sweet thank you, so can i download the binary from somewhere or do
>> i have to
>> do a checkout from the svn repo?
>
> If you want to try it out immediately, you'll need to check out from
> the svn repo, and build the binary yourself (proverbial piece-of-cake
> if you already have Ant installed).
>
> Otherwise, you'll need to wait some for 0.95 final (to be released soon)
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17735387.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by Andreas Delmelle <an...@telenet.be>.
On Jun 5, 2008, at 17:31, _zachary_ wrote:
> Sweet thank you, so can i download the binary from somewhere or do
> i have to
> do a checkout from the svn repo?
If you want to try it out immediately, you'll need to check out from
the svn repo, and build the binary yourself (proverbial piece-of-cake
if you already have Ant installed).
Otherwise, you'll need to wait some for 0.95 final (to be released soon)
Cheers
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com>.
Sweet thank you, so can i download the binary from somewhere or do i have to
do a checkout from the svn repo?
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> Could have been a regression introduced by my refactoring the handling
> of block-containers between 0.94 and 0.95beta. The case wasn't covered
> in our test suite. I've committed a fix to the 0.95 branch:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663482&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_95
>
> The problem was that the flow area didn't generate a real reference area
> (i.e. a new coordinate system).
>
> Please note that the width="100%" will still (i.e. like in 0.94) return
> a value that may not exactly be what you need for such a column
> separator. I don't think there's any construct in XSL-FO that allows you
> to express that properly. FO-Implementations like AntennaHouse have
> proprietary extension for that.
>
> On 04.06.2008 22:14:56 _zachary_ wrote:
>>
>> It is a column separator, however the line flows over the text in 0.95
>> e.g. fop0.95
>>
>> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
>> |
>> |
>>
>> e.g fop0.94
>> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
>> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>>
>> So how would i get this to work in 0.95? the left position isn't what
>> matters its the floating over the text when i span all that matters.
>>
>> thank you for your help and time. I really appreciate it
>>
>>
>> Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> >> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not
>> >> float over
>> >> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or
>> >> something that
>> >> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to
>> >> get the
>> >> same results that 0.94 returns?
>> >
>> > For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that
>> > 9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto
>> > width) minus 1.4in (margins).
>> > If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the
>> > intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a
>> > visual column-separator (?)
>> >
>> > For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously
>> > hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would
>> > require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take
>> > that into account when painting the areas.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Andreas
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17655634.html
>> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17672698.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
Could have been a regression introduced by my refactoring the handling
of block-containers between 0.94 and 0.95beta. The case wasn't covered
in our test suite. I've committed a fix to the 0.95 branch:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663482&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_95
The problem was that the flow area didn't generate a real reference area
(i.e. a new coordinate system).
Please note that the width="100%" will still (i.e. like in 0.94) return
a value that may not exactly be what you need for such a column
separator. I don't think there's any construct in XSL-FO that allows you
to express that properly. FO-Implementations like AntennaHouse have
proprietary extension for that.
On 04.06.2008 22:14:56 _zachary_ wrote:
>
> It is a column separator, however the line flows over the text in 0.95
> e.g. fop0.95
>
> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
> |
> |
>
> e.g fop0.94
> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
> So how would i get this to work in 0.95? the left position isn't what
> matters its the floating over the text when i span all that matters.
>
> thank you for your help and time. I really appreciate it
>
>
> Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not
> >> float over
> >> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or
> >> something that
> >> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to
> >> get the
> >> same results that 0.94 returns?
> >
> > For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that
> > 9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto
> > width) minus 1.4in (margins).
> > If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the
> > intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a
> > visual column-separator (?)
> >
> > For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously
> > hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would
> > require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take
> > that into account when painting the areas.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17655634.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com>.
It is a column separator, however the line flows over the text in 0.95
e.g. fop0.95
This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh
|
|
e.g fop0.94
This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
This is some test content! blah blah balh balh
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how would i get this to work in 0.95? the left position isn't what
matters its the floating over the text when i span all that matters.
thank you for your help and time. I really appreciate it
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not
>> float over
>> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or
>> something that
>> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to
>> get the
>> same results that 0.94 returns?
>
> For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that
> 9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto
> width) minus 1.4in (margins).
> If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the
> intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a
> visual column-separator (?)
>
> For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously
> hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would
> require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take
> that into account when painting the areas.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17655634.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by Andreas Delmelle <an...@telenet.be>.
On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote:
Hi
> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not
> float over
> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or
> something that
> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to
> get the
> same results that 0.94 returns?
For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that
9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto
width) minus 1.4in (margins).
If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the
intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a
visual column-separator (?)
For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously
hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would
require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take
that into account when painting the areas.
Cheers
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: FOP 0.94 AND 0.95b
Posted by _zachary_ <zd...@mac.com>.
Thank you, i got it working.
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>
>
> Hi Zachary,
>
>>----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
>>Van: _zachary_ [mailto:zdains@mac.com]
>>Verzonden: donderdag, juni 12, 2008 10:50 PM
>>
>>This is what occurs when i try to build using ant v1.7
>>
>>=====================================
>>[root fop95]# ant
>>/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find xml-commons-apis Java
>>extension for this JVM
>>/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Some specified jars were not found
>>Buildfile: build.xml
>>
>>init-avail:
>> [echo] ------------------- Apache FOP 0.95beta [1999-2008]
>>----------------
>> [echo] See build.properties and build-local.properties for additional
>>build settings
>> [echo] Apache Ant version 1.7.0 compiled on June 5 2008
>> [echo] VM: 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51), Free Software
>> Foundation,
>>Inc.
>
> I see... All the issues most likely have the same cause: the fact that
> you're using GNU Classpath. If you would compile and build on a Sun JVM,
> it will most likely work from the first time. Same for Apple JVM, except
> that I already noticed that you also need to make sure that the build
> process uses the same Xerces/Xalan versions that are distributed with FOP.
>
> I've never worked with GCJ myself, but it seems like GNU's Java
> implementation is very far from complete... GCJ also comes with its own
> GNU XML parser, which lacks features that Xalan, for example, relies on.
>
> Best to switch the JVM and try again.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17825943.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org