Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

[chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,
I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some confusion as
below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this.

Here is the scenario:
A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo-plugins, and he
prefers to the admin console.  The datasource pool was deployed via console
wizard which is a .rar type. But He wasn't able to export the resource
adapter directly because only the geronimo configuration(.car) can be
exported now.  So he need to delete the resouce adapter and deploy its plan
again by specifying type as car.

If that's the case, why the console wizard cann't deploy the resource
adapter as a geronimo configuration at the first place?

Thanks  in advance.

Jeff C

Re: Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

[chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>]

Thanks.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4749

Jeff C

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I thought we had successfully tracked down all the console bits that didn't
> create car files.  Could you please file a jira issue for 2.2?  If you can
> figure out a patch that would be even better :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:37 PM, chi runhua wrote:
>
>  Hi all,
>> I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some confusion
>> as below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this.
>>
>> Here is the scenario:
>> A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo-plugins, and he
>> prefers to the admin console.  The datasource pool was deployed via console
>> wizard which is a .rar type. But He wasn't able to export the resource
>> adapter directly because only the geronimo configuration(.car) can be
>> exported now.  So he need to delete the resouce adapter and deploy its plan
>> again by specifying type as car.
>>
>> If that's the case, why the console wizard cann't deploy the resource
>> adapter as a geronimo configuration at the first place?
>>
>> Thanks  in advance.
>>
>> Jeff C
>>
>

Re: Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

I thought we had successfully tracked down all the console bits that  
didn't create car files.  Could you please file a jira issue for 2.2?   
If you can figure out a patch that would be even better :-)

thanks
david jencks
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:37 PM, chi runhua wrote:

> Hi all,
> I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some  
> confusion as below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this.
>
> Here is the scenario:
> A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo-plugins, and  
> he prefers to the admin console.  The datasource pool was deployed  
> via console wizard which is a .rar type. But He wasn't able to  
> export the resource adapter directly because only the geronimo  
> configuration(.car) can be exported now.  So he need to delete the  
> resouce adapter and deploy its plan again by specifying type as car.
>
> If that's the case, why the console wizard cann't deploy the  
> resource adapter as a geronimo configuration at the first place?
>
> Thanks  in advance.
>
> Jeff C