You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com> on 2014/08/24 19:25:56 UTC
HTTPD-2.2.x and buildconf messages
In the past I have used buildconf messages as a reminder for where I should
be looking for apr and apr-util
Since I read in the VOTE thread a bit about the apr version being updated,
I would like to mention that buildconf still talks about 1.4.X versions.
root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.2.x]./buildconf
You don't have a copy of the apr source in srclib/apr.
Please get the source using the following instructions,
or specify the location of the source with
--with-apr=[path to apr] :
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.4.x srclib/apr
You don't have a copy of the apr-util source in srclib/apr-util.
Please get the source using the following instructions,
or specify the location of the source with
--with-apr-util=[path to apr-util] :
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x
srclib/apr-util
./buildconf --with-apr=../../apr/apr-1.5.1
--with-apr-util=../../apr/apr-util-1.5.3
FYI.
Re: HTTPD-2.2.x and buildconf messages
Posted by Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>.
OK. I was confused by this bit in the Vote thread:
Please take note of APR subversion version bump from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1
since 2.2.27 was released.
I guess I am easily confused ;)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <
ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com> wrote:
> This is true, because only 1.4.X is required.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Felt [mailto:mamfelt@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sonntag, 24. August 2014 19:26
> *To:* dev@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* HTTPD-2.2.x and buildconf messages
>
>
>
> In the past I have used buildconf messages as a reminder for where I
> should be looking for apr and apr-util
>
> Since I read in the VOTE thread a bit about the apr version being updated,
> I would like to mention that buildconf still talks about 1.4.X versions.
>
> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.2.x]./buildconf
>
> You don't have a copy of the apr source in srclib/apr.
> Please get the source using the following instructions,
> or specify the location of the source with
> --with-apr=[path to apr] :
>
> svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.4.x
> srclib/apr
>
>
> You don't have a copy of the apr-util source in srclib/apr-util.
> Please get the source using the following instructions,
> or specify the location of the source with
> --with-apr-util=[path to apr-util] :
>
> svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x
> srclib/apr-util
>
> ./buildconf --with-apr=../../apr/apr-1.5.1
> --with-apr-util=../../apr/apr-util-1.5.3
>
> FYI.
>
RE: HTTPD-2.2.x and buildconf messages
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
This is true, because only 1.4.X is required.
Regards
Rüdiger
From: Michael Felt [mailto:mamfelt@gmail.com]
Sent: Sonntag, 24. August 2014 19:26
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: HTTPD-2.2.x and buildconf messages
In the past I have used buildconf messages as a reminder for where I should be looking for apr and apr-util
Since I read in the VOTE thread a bit about the apr version being updated, I would like to mention that buildconf still talks about 1.4.X versions.
root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.2.x]./buildconf<mailto:root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.2.x%5d./buildconf>
You don't have a copy of the apr source in srclib/apr.
Please get the source using the following instructions,
or specify the location of the source with
--with-apr=[path to apr] :
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.4.x srclib/apr
You don't have a copy of the apr-util source in srclib/apr-util.
Please get the source using the following instructions,
or specify the location of the source with
--with-apr-util=[path to apr-util] :
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x srclib/apr-util
./buildconf --with-apr=../../apr/apr-1.5.1 --with-apr-util=../../apr/apr-util-1.5.3
FYI.