You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Robert Metzger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/12/22 20:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-30443) Expand list of sensitive keys

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Metzger closed FLINK-30443.
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.17.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Merged to master (1.17) in https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/d7b63aee3b02e71f837e1f0b18f1b93790765d9f

> Expand list of sensitive keys
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-30443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30443
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API / Core
>            Reporter: Gunnar Morling
>            Assignee: Gunnar Morling
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.17.0
>
>
> In {{{}GlobalConfiguration{}}}, there is [a list of known configuration keys|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/GlobalConfiguration.java#L47-L48] whose values will be masked in log output. In our Flink deployment there's a few more keys which we would like to mask, specifically, the following ones:
> * "auth-params"
> * "service-key"
> * "token"
> * "basic-auth"
> * "jaas.config"
> While those are somewhat use-case specific, I feel they are generic enough for being added to that list, and there already is precedence in form of "fs.azure.account.key". In that light, I don't think it's worth making this somehow pluggable, but I'm curious what other folks here think. Thanks!
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)