You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2003/12/17 22:16:57 UTC
[mp2] s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/?
Before we released the new API in the wild, how about s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/
I find myself typing APR::FInfo instead of APR::Finfo all the time, as this is
the convention we follow for most modules.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: [mp2] s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/?
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>Before we released the new API in the wild, how about
>>s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/ I find myself typing APR::FInfo instead of
>>APR::Finfo all the time, as this is the convention we follow for most
>>modules.
>
>
> I prefer it the way it is - it's the finfo field in the request rec, not the
> fInfo or FInfo field. while we have some examples where we double-cap
> classes in cases like these (APR::SockAddr), the majority of them have a _
> between the names (RequestRec) or are clearly disinguished (ServerUtil).
>
> but if you absolutely need to change it...
I have no strong feelings about it. If you think it's fine, then it's OK with
me. I'm just trying to think of more intuitive spelling.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: [mp2] s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/?
Posted by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Before we released the new API in the wild, how about
> s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/ I find myself typing APR::FInfo instead of
> APR::Finfo all the time, as this is the convention we follow for most
> modules.
I prefer it the way it is - it's the finfo field in the request rec, not the
fInfo or FInfo field. while we have some examples where we double-cap
classes in cases like these (APR::SockAddr), the majority of them have a _
between the names (RequestRec) or are clearly disinguished (ServerUtil).
but if you absolutely need to change it...
--Geoff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org