You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hc.apache.org by Tatu Saloranta <co...@yahoo.com> on 2006/09/29 20:30:08 UTC
Re: [HttpCore][HttpAsync][POLL] Java 1.5 dependency for HttpCore NIO and eventually HttpAsync?
--- Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have been quietly working on the NIO based client
> in HttpCore NIO and
> kind of missed java.util.concurrent primitives a lot
> in the process of
> it.
>
> How would everyone feel about possibility of using
> Java 1.5 for HttpCore
> NIO (and possibly HttpAsync as it would also benefit
> greatly from using
> java.util.concurrent code instead of home brewed
> sync primitives)?
At this point in time, I would say "go for it". It is
new component, and would have clear benefits.
-+ Tatu +-
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [HttpCore][HttpAsync][POLL] Java 1.5 dependency for HttpCore NIO and eventually HttpAsync?
Posted by Sam Berlin <sb...@gmail.com>.
At the very least, there needs to be a 1.4.1 minimum requirement for
NIO. (1.4.0 had different behavior for how a selector responds to
write interest -- it uses edged-triggered behavior [see:
http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html#nb.edge ] on some OS's and
level-triggered on others. 1.4.1 made it level-triggered everywhere.)
Sam
On 9/29/06, Tatu Saloranta <co...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have been quietly working on the NIO based client
> > in HttpCore NIO and
> > kind of missed java.util.concurrent primitives a lot
> > in the process of
> > it.
> >
> > How would everyone feel about possibility of using
> > Java 1.5 for HttpCore
> > NIO (and possibly HttpAsync as it would also benefit
> > greatly from using
> > java.util.concurrent code instead of home brewed
> > sync primitives)?
>
> At this point in time, I would say "go for it". It is
> new component, and would have clear benefits.
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org