You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com> on 2009/03/01 10:47:46 UTC
Re: [site] Add James 3.x Site...?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build
>> now works but some more work is needed on the content.
>>
>> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from
>> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is
>> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)'
>>
>> opinions?
>
> We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the
> "Server" menu:
> ---------
> 2.3.1
> 2.3.0
> 2.2.0
> 3.0-dev
> ---------
>
> And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable".
in the end, i went for 'Development 3.0' since it seemed to read a
little easier (see http://james.apache.org/server/)
i used http://james.apache.org/server/head/index.html for the subsite
(since there were a number of places where 'head' was already used)
i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and
external products
i wonder whether
http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and
http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be
usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow
opinions and feedback welcomed :-)
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [site] Add James 3.x Site...?
Posted by Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de>.
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> opinions and feedback welcomed :-)
>
> You did a very good job :-)
> Thank you,
+1
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [site] Add James 3.x Site...?
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip>
>> i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and
>> external products
>
> cool!
would be great to have an aggregated build (like javadocs). i took a
quick look but the maven javadoc plugin seemed to have great fun doing
it so i bowed out.
>> i wonder whether
>> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and
>> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be
>> usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow
>
> It is a matter of manually checking that all of the content in
> provided_* is already in javadocs and then we could remove it. It's a
> long and boring task :-(
thought that might be the case
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [site] Add James 3.x Site...?
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build
>>> now works but some more work is needed on the content.
>>>
>>> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from
>>> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is
>>> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)'
>>>
>>> opinions?
>> We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the
>> "Server" menu:
>> ---------
>> 2.3.1
>> 2.3.0
>> 2.2.0
>> 3.0-dev
>> ---------
>>
>> And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable".
>
> in the end, i went for 'Development 3.0' since it seemed to read a
> little easier (see http://james.apache.org/server/)
>
> i used http://james.apache.org/server/head/index.html for the subsite
> (since there were a number of places where 'head' was already used)
+1
> i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and
> external products
cool!
> i wonder whether
> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and
> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be
> usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow
It is a matter of manually checking that all of the content in
provided_* is already in javadocs and then we could remove it. It's a
long and boring task :-(
> opinions and feedback welcomed :-)
You did a very good job :-)
Thank you,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org