You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by "Andreas Lehmkühler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/18 11:34:34 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (PDFBOX-2001) Digital Signature information (parser bug?)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andreas Lehmkühler resolved PDFBOX-2001.
----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Everthing seems to be OK. The signature is available and it doesn't matter if one uses the 1.8 branch or the current trunk. It works with both parsers. The rendering outputs of the 1.8 branch and the trunk are nearly the same. It looks as if there isn't any need for another annontation patch.
I'm setting this to resolved. Thanks for all your input.

> Digital Signature information (parser bug?)
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-2001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Parsing
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.7, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Nicolas Kaczmarski
>            Assignee: Andreas Lehmkühler
>              Labels: Annotations, Signature
>             Fix For: 1.8.8, 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: D.1_signiert.pdf, PDFBOX2001-D.1_signiert1.png, acrobatSignatureExample.PNG, anno.patch
>
>
> We have a signed PDF but signature is described without key "Sig".
> As you can see in the standard PDF 32000-1:2008 - Table 252 - Entries in a signature dictionary, this key is optional :
> "(Optional) The type of PDF object that this dictionary describes; if present, shall be Sig for a signature dictionary. "
> But PDFBox seems to limit its research of signature only if this key "Sig" is present.
> What is your position about that?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)