You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> on 2017/09/23 11:33:03 UTC

WICKET-6308 in wicket-6.x ?

Hi devs,

Is it ok I port the following change to wicket-6.x branch?

[WICKET-6308] - Add an extra constructor to EmailTextField with a custom
validator but without model

Thanks in advance,
Sebastien.

Re: WICKET-6308 in wicket-6.x ?

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Thanks, Sven :)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:

> +1 that additional constructor should do no harm
>
> Sven
>

Re: WICKET-6308 in wicket-6.x ?

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

+1 that additional constructor should do no harm

Sven


Am 23.09.2017 um 13:33 schrieb Sebastien:
> Hi devs,
>
> Is it ok I port the following change to wicket-6.x branch?
>
> [WICKET-6308] - Add an extra constructor to EmailTextField with a custom
> validator but without model
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sebastien.
>