You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org> on 2009/03/16 10:15:57 UTC
M2 repo error
On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
there is a file
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions it is
prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it, nor 2.1
for that matter.
Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo" (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0, 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
match range [2.2,3.0)
javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
Regards
--
Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
It may have been auto generated at some point.
If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
You can override it by putting a new one under
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it auto-generated
> perhaps?
>
> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> still a mvn newbie
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>> Subject: M2 repo error
>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>
>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>> there is a file
>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions it is
>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it, nor 2.1
>> for that matter.
>>
>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>
>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>
>>
>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Carlos,
You are right; I never received the message.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
We are currently on maven 1 with a complex maven.xml that will take
some time to migrate. But we also have a maven 2 pom that we can
publish, along with the updated maven-metadata.xml.
>
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
Ok. Thanks,
Craig
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
That's my fault.
I've updated the /www/people.apache.org/m2 repo so the metadata file
is in the right place (I think).
Can someone review what I've done and push it?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
>>> added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
>
> Hi,
>
> I just looked at Ibiblio, the "maven-metadata.xml" is applied at
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/
>
> yet I'd expect to find it under
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>
> (the one under the latter location still refers to the older
> versions of
> jdo2-api).
>
> --
> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
That's my fault.
I've updated the /www/people.apache.org/m2 repo so the metadata file
is in the right place (I think).
Can someone review what I've done and push it?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
>>> added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
>
> Hi,
>
> I just looked at Ibiblio, the "maven-metadata.xml" is applied at
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/
>
> yet I'd expect to find it under
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>
> (the one under the latter location still refers to the older
> versions of
> jdo2-api).
>
> --
> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>.
> > added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
Hi,
I just looked at Ibiblio, the "maven-metadata.xml" is applied at
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/
yet I'd expect to find it under
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
(the one under the latter location still refers to the older versions of
jdo2-api).
--
Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>.
> > added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
Hi,
I just looked at Ibiblio, the "maven-metadata.xml" is applied at
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/
yet I'd expect to find it under
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
(the one under the latter location still refers to the older versions of
jdo2-api).
--
Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Thanks!
Craig
On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>>>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>>>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>>>
>>>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>>>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>>>
>>>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>>>> javax.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo
>>>>> name
>>>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>>>> rsync-
>>>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please
>>>>>> push
>>>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>>>>
>>>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Thanks!
Craig
On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>>>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>>>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>>>
>>>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>>>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>>>
>>>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>>>> javax.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo
>>>>> name
>>>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>>>> rsync-
>>>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please
>>>>>> push
>>>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>>>>
>>>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>>
>>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>>
>>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>>> javax.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>>> rsync-
>>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>>
>>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>
>>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>>>
>>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
added to the queue, should be updated in 24 hours
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>>
>>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>>
>>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>>> javax.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>>> rsync-
>>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>>
>>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>
>>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>>>
>>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
Thanks,
Craig
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>
>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>
>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>> javax.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>> rsync-
>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>
>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>
>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
So could someone please push the corrected metadata.xml to central?
Thanks,
Craig
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
>> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
>> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>>
>> The reference implementation is another open source project,
>> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>>
>> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>>> javax.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>>
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>>> rsync-
>>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>>
>>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>>
>>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
RE: M2 repo error
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
Ibiblio has been down lately, but it is not Central, just a mirror of
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:08 PM
To: repository@apache.org
Cc: Carlos Sanchez; Apache JDO project
Subject: Re: M2 repo error
I looked for the errant artifact on
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
and now I can't even find it, due to
Safari can't open the page
"http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
" because it could not connect to the server "mirrors.ibiblio.org".
So, is there some problem with ibiblio?
And can someone push the corrected artifact?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>
> The reference implementation is another open source project,
> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>
> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>> javax.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>> rsync-
>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>
>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>
>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
RE: M2 repo error
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
Ibiblio has been down lately, but it is not Central, just a mirror of
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:08 PM
To: repository@apache.org
Cc: Carlos Sanchez; Apache JDO project
Subject: Re: M2 repo error
I looked for the errant artifact on
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
and now I can't even find it, due to
Safari can't open the page
"http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
" because it could not connect to the server "mirrors.ibiblio.org".
So, is there some problem with ibiblio?
And can someone push the corrected artifact?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>
> The reference implementation is another open source project,
> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>
> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>> javax.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>> rsync-
>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>
>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>
>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
I looked for the errant artifact on http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
and now I can't even find it, due to
Safari can’t open the page “http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
” because it could not connect to the server “mirrors.ibiblio.org”.
So, is there some problem with ibiblio?
And can someone push the corrected artifact?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>
> The reference implementation is another open source project,
> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>
> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>> javax.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>> rsync-
>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>
>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>
>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
I looked for the errant artifact on http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
and now I can't even find it, due to
Safari can’t open the page “http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
” because it could not connect to the server “mirrors.ibiblio.org”.
So, is there some problem with ibiblio?
And can someone push the corrected artifact?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
> JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
> well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
>
> The reference implementation is another open source project,
> DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
>
> Hopes that clarifies it for you.
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
>> javax.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
>> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
>> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>>> rsync-
>>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>>> them to ibiblio.
>>>
>>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>>
>>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>>> etadata.xml
>>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what
>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Brian,
Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
The reference implementation is another open source project,
DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
Hopes that clarifies it for you.
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
> javax.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
> Cc: Apache JDO project
> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>> rsync-
>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>> them to ibiblio.
>>
>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>
>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>> etadata.xml
>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Brian,
Apache JDO is responsible for maintaining the specification for
JSR-243 and as such, manages the javax.jdo (specification) space as
well as the org.apache.jdo (technology compatibility kit) space.
The reference implementation is another open source project,
DataNucleus http://www.datanucleus.org
Hopes that clarifies it for you.
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of
> javax.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
> To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
> Cc: Apache JDO project
> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
> space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
>> To: Carlos Sanchez
>> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
>> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-
>> rsync-
>> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
>> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
>> them to ibiblio.
>>
>> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>>
>>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
>> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
>> etadata.xml
>>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>>> it, nor
>>>>>> 2.1
>>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
RE: M2 repo error
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
Curious. I would have expected it to be org.apache.jdo instead of javax.
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:22 PM
To: repository@apache.org; Carlos Sanchez
Cc: Apache JDO project
Subject: Re: M2 repo error
Hi Brian,
The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
Regards,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
> To: Carlos Sanchez
> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
> them to ibiblio.
>
> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>
>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
> etadata.xml
>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>>> it is
>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>> it, nor
>>>>> 2.1
>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Brian,
The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
Regards,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
> To: Carlos Sanchez
> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
> them to ibiblio.
>
> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>
>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
> etadata.xml
>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>>> it is
>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>> it, nor
>>>>> 2.1
>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Brian,
The Apache JDO project is officially in charge of the javax.jdo name
space. And I'm acting on behalf of the Apache JDO project.
Regards,
Craig
On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
> To: Carlos Sanchez
> Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
> Subject: Re: M2 repo error
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
> repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
> metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
> them to ibiblio.
>
> There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
>> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>>
>> It may have been auto generated at some point.
>> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
>> You can override it by putting a new one under
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
>> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
> <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>>> there is a file
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
> etadata.xml
>>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>>> it is
>>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>>> it, nor
>>>>> 2.1
>>>>> for that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
RE: M2 repo error
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
To: Carlos Sanchez
Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
Subject: Re: M2 repo error
Hi Carlos,
Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
them to ibiblio.
There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
<Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
etadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Carlos,
Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
them to ibiblio.
There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Carlos,
Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-
metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push
them to ibiblio.
There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Carlos,
You are right; I never received the message.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
We are currently on maven 1 with a complex maven.xml that will take
some time to migrate. But we also have a maven 2 pom that we can
publish, along with the updated maven-metadata.xml.
>
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
Ok. Thanks,
Craig
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
Maybe you haven't got my message:
It may have been auto generated at some point.
If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
You can override it by putting a new one under
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> Any ideas?
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>
>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> still a mvn newbie
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>
>>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>> there is a file
>>>
>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions it is
>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it, nor
>>> 2.1
>>> for that matter.
>>>
>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>
>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Any ideas?
Craig
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it auto-
> generated perhaps?
>
> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> still a mvn newbie
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>> Subject: M2 repo error
>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>
>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>> there is a file
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>> it is
>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it,
>> nor 2.1
>> for that matter.
>>
>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo" (javax.jdo/
>> jdo2-api)
>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>
>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0, 2.1-
>> SNAPSHOT] to
>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>
>>
>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Any ideas?
Craig
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it auto-
> generated perhaps?
>
> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> still a mvn newbie
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>> Subject: M2 repo error
>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>
>> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>> there is a file
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions
>> it is
>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it,
>> nor 2.1
>> for that matter.
>>
>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo" (javax.jdo/
>> jdo2-api)
>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>
>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0, 2.1-
>> SNAPSHOT] to
>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>
>>
>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Fwd: M2 repo error
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi,
I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it auto-
generated perhaps?
Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Craig
still a mvn newbie
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>
> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
> Subject: M2 repo error
> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>
> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
> there is a file
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-metadata.xml
> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions it
> is
> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in it,
> nor 2.1
> for that matter.
>
> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo" (javax.jdo/
> jdo2-api)
> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>
> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0, 2.1-
> SNAPSHOT] to
> match range [2.2,3.0)
> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>
>
> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>
> Regards
> --
> Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>.
> Same goes for
>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api-legacy/maven-metadata.xml
2.2 and 2.3-SNAPSHOT are available (temporarily?) by specifying an M2
repository of
http://www.datanucleus.org/downloads/maven2/
--
Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
Re: M2 repo error
Posted by Andy Jefferson <an...@datanucleus.org>.
> On http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
> there is a file
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-meta
>data.xml
Same goes for
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api-legacy/maven-metadata.xml
--
Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)