You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/06 15:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Work logged] (HIVE-23671) MSCK repair should handle transactional tables in certain usecases

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23671?focusedWorklogId=454905&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-454905 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-23671:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 06/Jul/20 15:27
            Start Date: 06/Jul/20 15:27
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: pvargacl commented on a change in pull request #1087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1087#discussion_r450301348



##########
File path: ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/AcidUtils.java
##########
@@ -2392,33 +2392,29 @@ public static TableSnapshot getTableSnapshot(Configuration conf,
     long writeId = -1;
     ValidWriteIdList validWriteIdList = null;
 
-    HiveTxnManager sessionTxnMgr = SessionState.get().getTxnMgr();
-    String fullTableName = getFullTableName(dbName, tblName);
-    if (sessionTxnMgr != null && sessionTxnMgr.getCurrentTxnId() > 0) {
-      validWriteIdList = getTableValidWriteIdList(conf, fullTableName);
-      if (isStatsUpdater) {
-        writeId = SessionState.get().getTxnMgr() != null ?
-                SessionState.get().getTxnMgr().getAllocatedTableWriteId(
-                  dbName, tblName) : -1;
-        if (writeId < 1) {
-          // TODO: this is not ideal... stats updater that doesn't have write ID is currently
-          //       "create table"; writeId would be 0/-1 here. No need to call this w/true.
-          LOG.debug("Stats updater for {}.{} doesn't have a write ID ({})",
-              dbName, tblName, writeId);
+    if (SessionState.get() != null) {

Review comment:
       It can be null, if the sessionstate was not set properly, it was failing one of the tests, i can't remember which.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 454905)
    Time Spent: 7h  (was: 6h 50m)

> MSCK repair should handle transactional tables in certain usecases
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-23671
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23671
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Metastore
>            Reporter: Peter Varga
>            Assignee: Peter Varga
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 7h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The MSCK REPAIR tool does not handle transactional tables too well. It can find and add new partitions the same way as for non-transactional tables, but since the writeId differences are not handled, the data can not read back from the new partitions.
> We could handle some usecases when the writeIds in the HMS and the underlying data are not conflicting. If the HMS does not contains allocated writes for the table we can seed the table with the writeIds read from the directory structrure.
> Real life use cases could be:
>  * Copy data files from one cluster to another with different HMS, create the table and call MSCK REPAIR
>  * If the HMS db is lost, recreate the table and call MSCK REPAIR
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)