You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lenya.apache.org by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org> on 2009/03/26 11:49:34 UTC
[Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3
Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> Hi Lenya devs,
>
> I think it is time for another maintenance release. WDYT?
>
> I suggest that the vote will be open until Wednesday, March 18 15:00 CET
> (3 days excluding the weekend).
I'm a bit alarmed by the lack of response to this vote. I hope this is
due to the editor-related considerations mentioned by Rudolf. Counting
Rudolf's mail as -1, there are zero positive and one negative vote.
The release will be postponed until the editor issues are resolved. I
seriously hope we can address these issues asap. TIA to everyone who
helps investigating! We should avoid falling into the habit of overly
long release cycles again.
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: Kupu table issue (was: [Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3)
Posted by Rudolf Korhummel <ru...@korhummel.de>.
Am 27.03.2009 um 12:13 schrieb Andreas Hartmann:
> Rudolf Korhummel schrieb:
>
> […]
>
>> It seems kupu is working now on my local installation..
>
> That's good to hear, thanks for taking care of this!
>
>> I had to include the normal table schema and to declare table as
>> inline and block element, since kupu places tables inside <p> tags.
>
> Well, that's annoying, but I guess it has to suffice for the moment :(
Yes I'm also not happy with this "solution" and maybe there are still
some validation problems with kupu. :(
When we have a better solution we should remember to delete the
schemas in the default publication.
What about to remove kupu from the first position of the editors list,
since lenya is a xml cms and kupu is just a html editor ?
WDYT
>
>
>> I have done it inside the default publication using the fallback
>> protokoll.
>> Should I commit ?
>
> +1
Done.
Rudolf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Kupu table issue (was: [Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3)
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Rudolf Korhummel schrieb:
[…]
> It seems kupu is working now on my local installation..
That's good to hear, thanks for taking care of this!
> I had to include the normal table schema and to declare table as inline
> and block element, since kupu places tables inside <p> tags.
Well, that's annoying, but I guess it has to suffice for the moment :(
> I have done it inside the default publication using the fallback protokoll.
> Should I commit ?
+1
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3
Posted by Rudolf Korhummel <ru...@korhummel.de>.
Hi Andreas,
Am 26.03.2009 um 15:10 schrieb Andreas Hartmann:
> Hi Rudolf,
>
> Rudolf Korhummel schrieb:
>>> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>>> Hi Lenya devs,
>>>>
>>>> I think it is time for another maintenance release. WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that the vote will be open until Wednesday, March 18
>>>> 15:00 CET
>>>> (3 days excluding the weekend).
>>> I'm a bit alarmed by the lack of response to this vote. I hope
>>> this is
>>> due to the editor-related considerations mentioned by Rudolf.
>>> Counting
>>> Rudolf's mail as -1, there are zero positive and one negative vote.
>>>
>> I only think that new users trying the frst listet editor shoudn't
>> get
>> troubles creatng at
>> table. Update kupu to version 1.4 may be complicated. On the other
>> side I
>> see that the new onform editor is very usefull and should be
>> provided to
>> the users (after it works with IE). So I would propose to
>> overwrite the
>> table tag of the RelaxNg schema in the default publication (not in
>> the
>> resource type) .
It seems kupu is working now on my local installation..
I had to include the normal table schema and to declare table as
inline and block element, since kupu places tables inside <p> tags.
I have done it inside the default publication using the fallback
protokoll.
Should I commit ?
Rudolf
>>
>
> +1, I guess this is the cleanest option.
>
>> After this and the fix of the IE issue of oneform, 2.0.3
>> should be released.
>
> This sounds good. I'm firing up our old Windows box just now and
> will try to take care of the IE issue.
>
>
>> WDYT
>>> The release will be postponed until the editor issues are
>>> resolved. I
>>> seriously hope we can address these issues asap. TIA to everyone who
>>> helps investigating! We should avoid falling into the habit of
>>> overly
>>> long release cycles again.
>>>
>> +1
>> (I'll try to adjust the schema)
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Andreas
>
>
> --
> Andreas Hartmann, CTO
> BeCompany GmbH
> http://www.becompany.ch
> Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Hi Rudolf,
Rudolf Korhummel schrieb:
>> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>>> Hi Lenya devs,
>>>
>>> I think it is time for another maintenance release. WDYT?
>>>
>>> I suggest that the vote will be open until Wednesday, March 18 15:00 CET
>>> (3 days excluding the weekend).
>> I'm a bit alarmed by the lack of response to this vote. I hope this is
>> due to the editor-related considerations mentioned by Rudolf. Counting
>> Rudolf's mail as -1, there are zero positive and one negative vote.
>>
> I only think that new users trying the frst listet editor shoudn't get
> troubles creatng at
> table. Update kupu to version 1.4 may be complicated. On the other side I
> see that the new onform editor is very usefull and should be provided to
> the users (after it works with IE). So I would propose to overwrite the
> table tag of the RelaxNg schema in the default publication (not in the
> resource type) .
+1, I guess this is the cleanest option.
> After this and the fix of the IE issue of oneform, 2.0.3
> should be released.
This sounds good. I'm firing up our old Windows box just now and will
try to take care of the IE issue.
> WDYT
>> The release will be postponed until the editor issues are resolved. I
>> seriously hope we can address these issues asap. TIA to everyone who
>> helps investigating! We should avoid falling into the habit of overly
>> long release cycles again.
>>
> +1
> (I'll try to adjust the schema)
Thanks!
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: [Summary] [VOTE] Release 2.0.3
Posted by Rudolf Korhummel <ru...@korhummel.de>.
Hi all,
> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
>> Hi Lenya devs,
>>
>> I think it is time for another maintenance release. WDYT?
>>
>> I suggest that the vote will be open until Wednesday, March 18 15:00 CET
>> (3 days excluding the weekend).
>
> I'm a bit alarmed by the lack of response to this vote. I hope this is
> due to the editor-related considerations mentioned by Rudolf. Counting
> Rudolf's mail as -1, there are zero positive and one negative vote.
>
I only think that new users trying the frst listet editor shoudn't get
troubles creatng at
table. Update kupu to version 1.4 may be complicated. On the other side I
see that the new onform editor is very usefull and should be provided to
the users (after it works with IE). So I would propose to overwrite the
table tag of the RelaxNg schema in the default publication (not in the
resource type) . After this and the fix of the IE issue of oneform, 2.0.3
should be released.
WDYT
>
> The release will be postponed until the editor issues are resolved. I
> seriously hope we can address these issues asap. TIA to everyone who
> helps investigating! We should avoid falling into the habit of overly
> long release cycles again.
>
+1
(I'll try to adjust the schema)
Rudolf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org