You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/12 20:42:54 UTC

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1720) replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values

replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: SOLR-1720
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.4
            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
             Fix For: 1.5


Jason reported problems with Multiple replicateAfter values - it worked after changing to just "commit"
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e4c9ba46dc03b031/replication_problem

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1720) replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values

Posted by "Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799600#action_12799600 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1720:
---------------------------------------------

Yonik, replicateAfter is supposed to be specified multiple times with different values. A single replicateAfter with comma separated value is invalid. So it is by design, not a bug. We could change that if you want.

> replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Jason reported problems with Multiple replicateAfter values - it worked after changing to just "commit"
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e4c9ba46dc03b031/replication_problem

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Closed: (SOLR-1720) replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values

Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Yonik Seeley closed SOLR-1720.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid

> replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Jason reported problems with Multiple replicateAfter values - it worked after changing to just "commit"
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e4c9ba46dc03b031/replication_problem

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1720) replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values

Posted by "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799843#action_12799843 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1720:
----------------------------------------

For consistency maybe we should support comma delimited lists?  I edit the shards a lot (comma delimited), which could use different elements as well, so by rote, I just used commas for this, because it seemed like a Solr standard... 

Thanks for clarifying!

> replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Jason reported problems with Multiple replicateAfter values - it worked after changing to just "commit"
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e4c9ba46dc03b031/replication_problem

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1720) replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values

Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799800#action_12799800 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1720:
------------------------------------

Gah - totally missed that!  I saw the syntax Jason used and just assumed it was supposed to work.
Let's just change the example on the wiki to include startup?

      <str name="replicateAfter">commit</str>
      <str name="replicateAfter">startup</str>

That will match the example schema and prevent any confusion over "multiple values".


> replication configuration bug with multiple replicateAfter values
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1720
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Jason reported problems with Multiple replicateAfter values - it worked after changing to just "commit"
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e4c9ba46dc03b031/replication_problem

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.