You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> on 2012/12/07 19:47:41 UTC
what is Wicket 2.x?
Hello *,
while reading this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
I stumbled upon the following sentence:
«NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel
interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x»
What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard about
2.x...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Kees van Dieren <in...@squins.com>.
We are using Wicket 6 .0 on OC4j 10.1.3.5. This is a Servlet 2.4 container
with support of some Servlet api 2.5 features.
Work well here.
The quickstart application works on OC4J (
http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html). (some slight modification
is needed when using Wicket via a web.xml Filter).
If you are familiar with Maven, using the quickstart archetype it is quite
easy to give it a try :).
2012/12/11 Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org> wrote:
> >> I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
> >> people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
> >> who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
> >
> > I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye
> > old container?
>
> Actually, no. The relase notes said "you need to have servlet api
> 2.5" and I believed them.
>
> Joachim
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
> Email: jschrod@acm.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet,
Kees van Dieren
Squins | IT, Honestly
Oranjestraat 23
2983 HL Ridderkerk
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 (0)6 30413841
www.squins.com
http://twitter.com/keesvandieren
Chamber of commerce Rotterdam: 24435130
Boeken voor school en werk bestel je op studieboekencenter.nl
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org>.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org> wrote:
>> I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
>> people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
>> who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye
> old container?
Actually, no. The relase notes said "you need to have servlet api
2.5" and I believed them.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
Email: jschrod@acm.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org> wrote:
> I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
> people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
> who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye
old container?
I guess it should not be too difficult of fixing 1.5 to actually run
on a 2.4 servlet api.
At least Wicket 1.5.10-SNAPSHOT builds when I modify the servlet API
dependency to 2.4 (no compilation nor unit test failures)
Wicket 6 also requires Java 6, which might pose bigger problems.
> I'm one of them. :-( Next year, upgrade to JBoss 7 and thus Wicket
> 6 is hopefully possible.
I hope so too.
Martijn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Joachim Schrod <js...@acm.org>.
Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
> should be removed from the Wiki.
I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
I'm one of them. :-( Next year, upgrade to JBoss 7 and thus Wicket
6 is hopefully possible.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
Email: jschrod@acm.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account.
>
> Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
> should be removed from the Wiki.
Funny, I just gave a presentation to a institution that still runs
Wicket 1.4 applications and can only upgrade next year to a more
recent version (6)
I think we probably should compartmentalize the various pages better
(tagging?) so information about 1.4 is easier to detect.
Martijn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account.
Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
should be removed from the Wiki.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> wrote:
> In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thomerson ha scritto:
> > Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
> > remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
> >
>
> Can I (we, you, ...) edit that sentence from the wiki pages then? It's
> confusing for newcomers like me. Does the IModel interface work as
> described
> in that page also in 6.x, except for generics?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org>.
In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thomerson ha scritto:
> Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
> remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
>
Can I (we, you, ...) edit that sentence from the wiki pages then? It's
confusing for newcomers like me. Does the IModel interface work as described
in that page also in 6.x, except for generics?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Instead of adding components to their parents, you provide a child
with their parent at construction time. The idea was that it would
help in parsing, component construction and better feedback when
creating pages. The burden it imposed outweighed the benefits be a
great margin.
Martijn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
> remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://wickettraining.com
> *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil <go...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> It's an old experiment which was due to go to "ready for prime-time" but
>> never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket
>> 1.3.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello *,
>> >
>> > while reading this page
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
>> >
>> > I stumbled upon the following sentence:
>> >
>> > «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The
>> IModel
>> > interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x»
>> >
>> > What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard
>> > about
>> > 2.x...
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager.
>>
>> Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.
>>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil <go...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> It's an old experiment which was due to go to "ready for prime-time" but
> never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket
> 1.3.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello *,
> >
> > while reading this page
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
> >
> > I stumbled upon the following sentence:
> >
> > «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The
> IModel
> > interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x»
> >
> > What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard
> > about
> > 2.x...
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager.
>
> Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.
>
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Posted by Pierre Goupil <go...@gmail.com>.
Good evening,
It's an old experiment which was due to go to "ready for prime-time" but
never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket
1.3.
Regards,
Pierre
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> while reading this page
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
>
> I stumbled upon the following sentence:
>
> «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel
> interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x»
>
> What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard
> about
> 2.x...
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager.
Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.