You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by "Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)" <JG...@besitec.com> on 2009/07/22 16:38:00 UTC
should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Hello all,
I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that the
interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement this
interface for logging more individual information.
My requirement is:
I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site status
page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
interface.
Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
Serializable?
I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
Thx & best regards.
Jing Ge
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
RE: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by "Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)" <JG...@besitec.com>.
Hello Jeremy Thomerson,
For example: I want the site administrator know, for example, how many
users are active now, what are their session looks like, etc.
Thx
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jeremy@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:42
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Isn't the logger sort of a service that does the logging? Your page
shouldn't hold on to that. Perhaps it can get it from the application
or hold on to something else.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that
the
> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
this
> interface for logging more individual information.
>
> My requirement is:
>
> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
status
> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
> interface.
>
> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> Serializable?
>
> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>
> Thx & best regards.
> Jing Ge
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Isn't the logger sort of a service that does the logging? Your page
shouldn't hold on to that. Perhaps it can get it from the application
or hold on to something else.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that the
> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement this
> interface for logging more individual information.
>
> My requirement is:
>
> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site status
> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
> interface.
>
> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> Serializable?
>
> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>
> Thx & best regards.
> Jing Ge
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
RE: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by "Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)" <JG...@besitec.com>.
Got it! Thanks!
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 19:42
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
you shouldnt store those kind of objects (services or application
"static"
objects)
use LoadableDetachableModel for that
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:56, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
<JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> Well, the RequestLogger is not a pure service. It is also a data
object.
> It is actually a combination of service and data object.
>
> Regard
> Jing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jeremy@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:53
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
>
> Would you use new Model<UserService>(getYourUserService())? It's the
> same thing - they are services, not data objects.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
> DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> > Hello johan,
> >
> > Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as
an
> > object in a model. Something like this:
> >
> > New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger());
> >
> > Thx
> > Jing
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
> > To: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
> >
> > why would you serialize the request logger?
> > there is only one and that is attached to the Application it
shouldnt
> be
> > serialized.
> >
> > Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
> > implementations of ISessionStore
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
> > <JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea
that
> > the
> >> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
> > this
> >> interface for logging more individual information.
> >>
> >> My requirement is:
> >>
> >> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
> > status
> >> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the
Serializable
> >> interface.
> >>
> >> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> >> Serializable?
> >>
> >> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
> >>
> >> Thx & best regards.
> >> Jing Ge
> >>
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
you shouldnt store those kind of objects (services or application "static"
objects)
use LoadableDetachableModel for that
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:56, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
<JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> Well, the RequestLogger is not a pure service. It is also a data object.
> It is actually a combination of service and data object.
>
> Regard
> Jing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jeremy@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:53
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
>
> Would you use new Model<UserService>(getYourUserService())? It's the
> same thing - they are services, not data objects.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
> DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> > Hello johan,
> >
> > Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an
> > object in a model. Something like this:
> >
> > New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger());
> >
> > Thx
> > Jing
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
> > To: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
> >
> > why would you serialize the request logger?
> > there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt
> be
> > serialized.
> >
> > Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
> > implementations of ISessionStore
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
> > <JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that
> > the
> >> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
> > this
> >> interface for logging more individual information.
> >>
> >> My requirement is:
> >>
> >> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
> > status
> >> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
> >> interface.
> >>
> >> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> >> Serializable?
> >>
> >> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
> >>
> >> Thx & best regards.
> >> Jing Ge
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
RE: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by "Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)" <JG...@besitec.com>.
Well, the RequestLogger is not a pure service. It is also a data object.
It is actually a combination of service and data object.
Regard
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jeremy@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:53
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Would you use new Model<UserService>(getYourUserService())? It's the
same thing - they are services, not data objects.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> Hello johan,
>
> Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an
> object in a model. Something like this:
>
> New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger());
>
> Thx
> Jing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
>
> why would you serialize the request logger?
> there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt
be
> serialized.
>
> Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
> implementations of ISessionStore
>
> johan
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
> <JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that
> the
>> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
> this
>> interface for logging more individual information.
>>
>> My requirement is:
>>
>> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
> status
>> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
>> interface.
>>
>> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
>> Serializable?
>>
>> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>>
>> Thx & best regards.
>> Jing Ge
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Would you use new Model<UserService>(getYourUserService())? It's the
same thing - they are services, not data objects.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT
DEHAM)<JG...@besitec.com> wrote:
> Hello johan,
>
> Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an
> object in a model. Something like this:
>
> New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger());
>
> Thx
> Jing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
>
> why would you serialize the request logger?
> there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt be
> serialized.
>
> Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
> implementations of ISessionStore
>
> johan
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
> <JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that
> the
>> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
> this
>> interface for logging more individual information.
>>
>> My requirement is:
>>
>> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
> status
>> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
>> interface.
>>
>> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
>> Serializable?
>>
>> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>>
>> Thx & best regards.
>> Jing Ge
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
RE: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by "Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)" <JG...@besitec.com>.
Hello johan,
Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an
object in a model. Something like this:
New Model<RequestLogger>(getRequestLogger());
Thx
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 16:43
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
why would you serialize the request logger?
there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt be
serialized.
Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
implementations of ISessionStore
johan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
<JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that
the
> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement
this
> interface for logging more individual information.
>
> My requirement is:
>
> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site
status
> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
> interface.
>
> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> Serializable?
>
> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>
> Thx & best regards.
> Jing Ge
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: should the IRequestLogger implement Serializable?
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
why would you serialize the request logger?
there is only one and that is attached to the Application it shouldnt be
serialized.
Just like that Settings object is also not serialize able or the
implementations of ISessionStore
johan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:38, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM)
<JG...@besitec.com>wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to use the RequestLogger. It is really a greet idea that the
> interface ISessionLogInfo is defined. Developer can just implement this
> interface for logging more individual information.
>
> My requirement is:
>
> I want to use the instance of IRequestLogger for building a site status
> page, which means the IRequestLogger need implement the Serializable
> interface.
>
> Does anyone find any drawback for letting IRequestLogger implement
> Serializable?
>
> I am using wicket 1.4 rc4
>
> Thx & best regards.
> Jing Ge
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>