You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/13 22:05:41 UTC
Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Hi All,
I ran code coverage for trunk - svn revision no 366406, and results are as
following:-
OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
Classes: 92% (1084/1184)
Methods: 74% (15114/20298)
Blocks: 72% (467775/651316)
Lines: 72% (95682.6/133384)
OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
total packages: 76
total executable files: 1135
total classes: 1184
total methods: 20298
The zip file CodeCoverageResults_svn366406.zip with code coverage results
will be posted soon on http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/ (Thanks to
Andrew).
Thanks,
Ramandeep Kaur (ramandhindsa@gmail.com)
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I ran code coverage with -Djvmflags='-Demma.verbosity.level=silent -
Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource' as per
Andrew's suggestion, and it did not work.
This time, it passed jvm flag as -Djvmflags="'-Demma.verbosity.level=silentonly.
I have opened JIRA bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1091 for
this problem.
Thanks, Raman
On 2/24/06, Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> I did try that, but with double quotes.
>
> -Djvmflags="-Demma.verbosity.level=silent -
> Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource"
>
> and it did not work. As there was space in there, it took ""-
> Demma.verbosity.level=silent" as jvmflag and left the other half.
> But I guess I will try with single quote.
>
> Thanks, Raman
>
>
>
> On 2/24/06, Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/24/06, Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried to run code coverage with j2me/cdc/foundation. Here is the
> > issue:-
> > >
> > > To run tests with EMMA, there is a need to set up emma flag
> > > -Djvmflags=-Demma.verbosity.level=silent . This is basically to enable
> > EMMA
> > > not to print out any messages to avoid having any diffs. Now while
> > running
> > > tests with j2me/cdc/foundation, another value needs to be passed as
> > jvmflag
> > > as well which is
> > > -Djvmflags="
> > > Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource".
> > >
> > > It looks like changes needs be made to test harness so that it can
> > take
> > > multiple values for jvm flags and parse them properly.
> > > Any idea?? Please let me know.
> >
> > It should work if you put them into jvmflags separated by a space. e.g.:
> >
> > -Djvmflags='-Demma.verbosity.level=silent
> > -Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource '
> >
> > Let me know if that works.
> >
> > andrew
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ramandeep Kaur
> ramandhindsa@gmail.com
>
--
Ramandeep Kaur
ramandhindsa@gmail.com
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
Andrew,
Thanks for the suggestion.
I did try that, but with double quotes.
-Djvmflags="-Demma.verbosity.level=silent -
Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource"
and it did not work. As there was space in there, it took ""-
Demma.verbosity.level=silent" as jvmflag and left the other half.
But I guess I will try with single quote.
Thanks, Raman
On 2/24/06, Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/06, Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to run code coverage with j2me/cdc/foundation. Here is the
> issue:-
> >
> > To run tests with EMMA, there is a need to set up emma flag
> > -Djvmflags=-Demma.verbosity.level=silent. This is basically to enable
> EMMA
> > not to print out any messages to avoid having any diffs. Now while
> running
> > tests with j2me/cdc/foundation, another value needs to be passed as
> jvmflag
> > as well which is
> > -Djvmflags="
> > Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource".
> >
> > It looks like changes needs be made to test harness so that it can take
> > multiple values for jvm flags and parse them properly.
> > Any idea?? Please let me know.
>
> It should work if you put them into jvmflags separated by a space. e.g.:
>
> -Djvmflags='-Demma.verbosity.level=silent
> -Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource'
>
> Let me know if that works.
>
> andrew
>
--
Ramandeep Kaur
ramandhindsa@gmail.com
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 2/24/06, Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to run code coverage with j2me/cdc/foundation. Here is the issue:-
>
> To run tests with EMMA, there is a need to set up emma flag
> -Djvmflags=-Demma.verbosity.level=silent. This is basically to enable EMMA
> not to print out any messages to avoid having any diffs. Now while running
> tests with j2me/cdc/foundation, another value needs to be passed as jvmflag
> as well which is
> -Djvmflags="
> Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource".
>
> It looks like changes needs be made to test harness so that it can take
> multiple values for jvm flags and parse them properly.
> Any idea?? Please let me know.
It should work if you put them into jvmflags separated by a space. e.g.:
-Djvmflags='-Demma.verbosity.level=silent
-Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource'
Let me know if that works.
andrew
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I tried to run code coverage with j2me/cdc/foundation. Here is the issue:-
To run tests with EMMA, there is a need to set up emma flag -Djvmflags=-
Demma.verbosity.level=silent. This is basically to enable EMMA not to print
out any messages to avoid having any diffs. Now while running tests with
j2me/cdc/foundation, another value needs to be passed as jvmflag as well
which is
-Djvmflags=" Dij.dataSource=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedSimpleDataSource".
It looks like changes needs be made to test harness so that it can take
multiple values for jvm flags and parse them properly.
Any idea?? Please let me know.
Thanks, Raman
On 2/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
>
> > I am looking into setting up code coverage to run with
> > j2me/cdc/foundation as well.
>
> Great, that will add a handful of classes into the coverage.
>
> Thanks for the other numbers.
> Dan.
>
>
--
Ramandeep Kaur
ramandhindsa@gmail.com
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
> I am looking into setting up code coverage to run with
> j2me/cdc/foundation as well.
Great, that will add a handful of classes into the coverage.
Thanks for the other numbers.
Dan.
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
I am looking into setting up code coverage to run with j2me/cdc/foundation
as well.
--
Ramandeep Kaur
ramandhindsa@gmail.com
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
I ran the code coverage for multiple jvms. Summary is as following:
Environment
------------------
- sun jdk131
- sun jdk142
- sun jdk15
- OS: Windows 2000
- trunk - svn revision no. 373975
Code Coverage Summary
------------------------------------
OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
Classes: 92% (1106/1196)
Methods: 75% (15338/20367)
Blocks: 72% (474503/656406)
Lines: 72% (97248.4/134695)
OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
total packages: 79
total executable files: 1144
total classes: 1196
total methods: 20367
total executable lines: 134695
After comparing the code coverage results for multiple jvms (sun jdk131, sun
jdk142, sun jdk15) vs one jvm (sun jdk142) for svn revision 373975, the
findings are following:-
Classes coverage: class coverage remained same.
Method coverage: method coverage increased by 26 methods.
Block Coverage: block coverage increased by 637 blocks.
Line Coverage: line coverage increased by 145 lines.
--
Ramandeep Kaur
ramandhindsa@gmail.com
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your question.
>Is it possible to combine multiple test coverage runs?
Yes, it is possible to run code coverage for multiple jvms and then combine
all test coverage runs.
>j2me/cdc/foundation
>jdk13
>jdk14
>jdk15
I will run code coverage with the above jvms and will post the results as
soon as they are done.
Thanks,
Ramandeep Kaur (ramandhindsa@gmail.com)
On 1/17/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
>
> > These are the results for a single derbyall run and for jvm - sun jdk142
>
> Is it possible to combine multiple test coverage runs? If we had
> derbyall runs for all these environments combined then the coverage
> would correctly reflect the complete set of testing run.
>
> j2me/cdc/foundation
> jdk13
> jdk14
> jdk15
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
>
>
>
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
> These are the results for a single derbyall run and for jvm - sun jdk142
Is it possible to combine multiple test coverage runs? If we had
derbyall runs for all these environments combined then the coverage
would correctly reflect the complete set of testing run.
j2me/cdc/foundation
jdk13
jdk14
jdk15
Thanks,
Dan.
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Ramandeep Kaur <ra...@gmail.com>.
These are the results for a single derbyall run and for jvm - sun jdk142
Thanks,
Ramandeep Kaur (ramandhindsa@gmail.com)
On 1/13/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the numbers.
>
> Is this the result of a single derbyall run (which vm), multiple
> derbyall runs with different VMs, something else?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
>
>
> Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I ran code coverage for trunk - svn revision no 366406, and results are
> > as following:-
> >
> > OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
> >
> > Classes: 92% (1084/1184)
> > Methods: 74% (15114/20298)
> > Blocks: 72% (467775/651316)
> > Lines: 72% (95682.6/133384)
> >
> > OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
> >
> > total packages: 76
> > total executable files: 1135
> > total classes: 1184
> > total methods: 20298
> >
> >
> > The zip file CodeCoverageResults_svn366406.zip with code coverage
> > results will be posted soon on http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/
> > <http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/> (Thanks to Andrew).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ramandeep Kaur (ramandhindsa@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>)
>
>
>
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the numbers.
Is this the result of a single derbyall run (which vm), multiple
derbyall runs with different VMs, something else?
Thanks,
Dan.
Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I ran code coverage for trunk - svn revision no 366406, and results are
> as following:-
>
> OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
>
> Classes: 92% (1084/1184)
> Methods: 74% (15114/20298)
> Blocks: 72% (467775/651316)
> Lines: 72% (95682.6/133384)
>
> OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
>
> total packages: 76
> total executable files: 1135
> total classes: 1184
> total methods: 20298
>
>
> The zip file CodeCoverageResults_svn366406.zip with code coverage
> results will be posted soon on http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/
> <http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/> (Thanks to Andrew).
>
> Thanks,
> Ramandeep Kaur (ramandhindsa@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>)
Re: Code coverage results for trunk svn 366406
Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
> The zip file CodeCoverageResults_svn366406.zip with code coverage
> results will be posted soon on http://people.apache.org/
> ~fuzzylogic/ (Thanks to Andrew).
The full code coverage results can now be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/codecoverage/366406/
Thanks for doing this testing, Raman!
andrew