You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by abhijith <to...@gmail.com> on 2017/05/17 20:26:39 UTC
Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Hi,
We have a shared datastore setup and are currently running v1.4. We are
planning to upgrade to v2.1 with the same configuration.
One of the question which came up was if datastore itself compatible with 2
major versions? If we have to rollback v2.1 for some reason will it work
seamlessly between both versions?
There is always an option to shut it down take backup and put it back.
Wondering what is recommended here? Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Abhi
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by abhijith <to...@gmail.com>.
I don't think it works. Atleast I found one issue in getJMSDestination
header. There is check in ActiveMQDestination.fromAddress() method to check
for address to startsWith jms.queue or jms.topic. In v2.0 broker is adding
the address without this prefix even when anycastPrefix or multicastPrefix
is specified.
I will let Justin or Martyn confirm this or let me know if there is a
workaround. We dearly would like to have 1.4 clients working on 2.0,
otherwise we have to upgrade all clients along with broker which becomes
really difficult.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293p4726337.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
One thing is certain. It should work. If not we should fix it.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:33 PM Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think it will work.
>
> That's an area Justin Bertram and Martyn Taylor worked closer. I will let
> them answer.
>
>
> I can do some research about it tomorrow if they are out tomorrow for any
> reason.
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:53 PM abhijith <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the info. I am assuming you are referring to `data` option
>> present on server/bin/artemis and not distribution. Please let me know if
>> both are same.
>>
>> Another question on migration,
>>
>> Will 1.4 clients work with 2.0 or they have to migrate. I was hoping they
>> can continue to work with 1.4 client and we add anycastPrefix and
>> multicastPrefix on the acceptor. Please let me know if this will work.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhi
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293p4726302.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I think it will work.
That's an area Justin Bertram and Martyn Taylor worked closer. I will let
them answer.
I can do some research about it tomorrow if they are out tomorrow for any
reason.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:53 PM abhijith <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I am assuming you are referring to `data` option
> present on server/bin/artemis and not distribution. Please let me know if
> both are same.
>
> Another question on migration,
>
> Will 1.4 clients work with 2.0 or they have to migrate. I was hoping they
> can continue to work with 1.4 client and we add anycastPrefix and
> multicastPrefix on the acceptor. Please let me know if this will work.
>
> Thanks
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293p4726302.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by abhijith <to...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the info. I am assuming you are referring to `data` option
present on server/bin/artemis and not distribution. Please let me know if
both are same.
Another question on migration,
Will 1.4 clients work with 2.0 or they have to migrate. I was hoping they
can continue to work with 1.4 client and we add anycastPrefix and
multicastPrefix on the acceptor. Please let me know if this will work.
Thanks
Abhi
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293p4726302.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
there's also the convert tool for the config.
I recommend you testing (of course) the migration path somewhere
outside of production.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, abhijith <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a shared datastore setup and are currently running v1.4. We are
> planning to upgrade to v2.1 with the same configuration.
>
> One of the question which came up was if datastore itself compatible with 2
> major versions? If we have to rollback v2.1 for some reason will it work
> seamlessly between both versions?
>
> There is always an option to shut it down take backup and put it back.
> Wondering what is recommended here? Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: Artemis 2.0 upgrade Shared datastore
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
It's not. You have to export and import it again.
The address names won't require prefixes.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:39 PM abhijith <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a shared datastore setup and are currently running v1.4. We are
> planning to upgrade to v2.1 with the same configuration.
>
> One of the question which came up was if datastore itself compatible with 2
> major versions? If we have to rollback v2.1 for some reason will it work
> seamlessly between both versions?
>
> There is always an option to shut it down take backup and put it back.
> Wondering what is recommended here? Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-2-0-upgrade-Shared-datastore-tp4726293.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Clebert Suconic