You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> on 2009/09/14 12:32:13 UTC
WC-NG status burndown
A few people asked to see an updated burndown chart. I re-did the
last one so that the interval was one week based on Monday's. I will
try to update and post it regularly. I also added lines to compare
against for various dates. This chart looks a lot different than the
last one. I double-checked that it was using the same numbers. It
appears to be all the extra data points from using a one week interval
just makes it look different. I also backed it up from end of June to
beginning of June as the start point.
Obviously we are still behind the original goals, but the trend looks
positive. A few more weeks like the last four will have us looking a
lot better.
This was made from r39293
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2394592
Re: WC-NG status burndown
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Philipp Marek
<ph...@emerion.com> wrote:
> Hello Mark!
>
> On Montag, 14. September 2009, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> A few people asked to see an updated burndown chart. I re-did the
>> last one so that the interval was one week based on Monday's. I will
>> try to update and post it regularly. I also added lines to compare
>> against for various dates. This chart looks a lot different than the
>> last one. I double-checked that it was using the same numbers. It
>> appears to be all the extra data points from using a one week interval
>> just makes it look different. I also backed it up from end of June to
>> beginning of June as the start point.
>>
>> Obviously we are still behind the original goals, but the trend looks
>> positive. A few more weeks like the last four will have us looking a
>> lot better.
>>
>> This was made from r39293
>>
>
> I believe that the first date should read as 21st Dec. 2009, doesn't it?
Yes, I will fix that. It just came from a column heading I typed manually.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2394595
Re: WC-NG status burndown
Posted by Philipp Marek <ph...@emerion.com>.
Hello Mark!
On Montag, 14. September 2009, Mark Phippard wrote:
> A few people asked to see an updated burndown chart. I re-did the
> last one so that the interval was one week based on Monday's. I will
> try to update and post it regularly. I also added lines to compare
> against for various dates. This chart looks a lot different than the
> last one. I double-checked that it was using the same numbers. It
> appears to be all the extra data points from using a one week interval
> just makes it look different. I also backed it up from end of June to
> beginning of June as the start point.
>
> Obviously we are still behind the original goals, but the trend looks
> positive. A few more weeks like the last four will have us looking a
> lot better.
>
> This was made from r39293
>
I believe that the first date should read as 21st Dec. 2009, doesn't it?
Regards,
Phil
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2394594