You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Neha Narkhede <ne...@confluent.io> on 2017/01/03 19:43:03 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Dormant/Inactive KIPs
+1. This is a good idea as we have a lot of KIPs in flight.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:53 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate
> table in the wiki. I think this is a good idea as it will make it easier
> for people to see the KIPs that are actually active. The list that Grant
> proposed then was:
>
> - KIP-6 - New reassignment partition logic for rebalancing (dormant)
> > - KIP-14 - Tools standardization (dormant)
> > - KIP-17 - Add HighwaterMarkOffset to OffsetFetchResponse (dormant)
> > - KIP-18 - JBOD Support (dormant)
> > - KIP-23 - Add JSON/CSV output and looping options to
> ConsumerGroupCommand
> > (dormant)
> > - KIP-27 - Conditional Publish (dormant)
> > - KIP-30 - Allow for brokers to have plug-able consensus and meta data
> storage
> > sub systems (dormant)
> > - KIP-39: Pinning controller to broker (dormant)
> > - KIP-44 - Allow Kafka to have a customized security protocol (dormant)
> > - KIP-46 - Self Healing (dormant)
> > - KIP-47 - Add timestamp-based log deletion policy (blocked - by KIP-33)
> > - KIP-53 - Add custom policies for reconnect attempts to NetworkdClient
> > - KIP-58 - Make Log Compaction Point Configurable (blocked - by KIP-33)
> > - KIP-61: Add a log retention parameter for maximum disk space usage
> > percentage (dormant)
> > - KIP-68 Add a consumed log retention before log retention (dormant)
>
>
> KIP-58 was adopted since then and it probably makes sense to add KIP-10 to
> the list.
>
> Are people OK with this? Feel free to suggest KIPs that should or should
> not be in the inactive/dormant list.
>
> Ismael
>
--
Thanks,
Neha
Re: [DISCUSS] Dormant/Inactive KIPs
Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
+1 as well.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Neha Narkhede <ne...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1. This is a good idea as we have a lot of KIPs in flight.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:53 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate
> > table in the wiki. I think this is a good idea as it will make it easier
> > for people to see the KIPs that are actually active. The list that Grant
> > proposed then was:
> >
> > - KIP-6 - New reassignment partition logic for rebalancing (dormant)
> > > - KIP-14 - Tools standardization (dormant)
> > > - KIP-17 - Add HighwaterMarkOffset to OffsetFetchResponse (dormant)
> > > - KIP-18 - JBOD Support (dormant)
> > > - KIP-23 - Add JSON/CSV output and looping options to
> > ConsumerGroupCommand
> > > (dormant)
> > > - KIP-27 - Conditional Publish (dormant)
> > > - KIP-30 - Allow for brokers to have plug-able consensus and meta data
> > storage
> > > sub systems (dormant)
> > > - KIP-39: Pinning controller to broker (dormant)
> > > - KIP-44 - Allow Kafka to have a customized security protocol
> (dormant)
> > > - KIP-46 - Self Healing (dormant)
> > > - KIP-47 - Add timestamp-based log deletion policy (blocked - by
> KIP-33)
> > > - KIP-53 - Add custom policies for reconnect attempts to
> NetworkdClient
> > > - KIP-58 - Make Log Compaction Point Configurable (blocked - by
> KIP-33)
> > > - KIP-61: Add a log retention parameter for maximum disk space usage
> > > percentage (dormant)
> > > - KIP-68 Add a consumed log retention before log retention (dormant)
> >
> >
> > KIP-58 was adopted since then and it probably makes sense to add KIP-10
> to
> > the list.
> >
> > Are people OK with this? Feel free to suggest KIPs that should or should
> > not be in the inactive/dormant list.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> --
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
--
-- Guozhang