You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to nmaven-dev@incubator.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/06/05 04:54:33 UTC
roadmap for 0.16?
Hi,
I went through JIRA and did this:
- anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it
keeps the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
- closed a couple of old ones out
- marked 0.15 as released
Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features
from 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter,
what will NMaven 1.0 be?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 05/06/2008, at 3:32 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
> For 0.16:
> Features currently in trunk:
> * NUnit (Evan completed this but still need to fully test)
> * More Archetypes (already have a number of new ones)
Cool.
> Partial:
> * Toolchain - I implemented this off of the work in 2.0.x branch but
> need to
> test out with the latest 2.0.9 release.
It didn't change much, so I think it should be ok. Worth checking.
> New 0.16+
> Plugins: We have a number of plugins in 0.14 that are not in 0.16:
> fxcop,
> xsd, wsdl. Sandcastle plugin would also be a big plus. Wix for Windows
> Installer generation would also be useful.
xsd and wsdl would be the most important ones, right?
Is the current wix plugin (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/nmaven/trunk/plugins/maven-dotnet-wix-plugin/
) functional?
>
> Languages: VB.NET
> Visual Studio: The goal here would be to port (or rewrite where
> necessary)
> the 0.15 work to trunk. Personally, I think the easiest thing to do
> is to
> start with the cs project generators. Also we need to find out what
> would be
> reusable for VS 2008.
Makes sense. It seems like maybe a near term 0.16 release that has
nunit, archetypes and toolchains would be worthwhile, and moving
forward with the others in subsequent releases?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Erik Ramfelt <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After lurking in the ml for a while, I can take a look at helping out
> with the fxcop plugin. It doesnt seem that complex, so perhaps it can
> be a good starting point for me. Is there a branch for 0.16+ or is it
> trunk?
Welcome! The trunk is currently 0.16-incubating-SNAPSHOT, so that's
the best place to start.
(There was a 0.15 release, and there is a branch for 0.14 which is
being maintained until all of its features re-appear on trunk.)
--
Wendy
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Erik Ramfelt <er...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For 0.16:
> Features currently in trunk:
> * NUnit (Evan completed this but still need to fully test)
> * More Archetypes (already have a number of new ones)
>
> Partial:
> * Toolchain - I implemented this off of the work in 2.0.x branch but need to
> test out with the latest 2.0.9 release.
>
> New 0.16+
> Plugins: We have a number of plugins in 0.14 that are not in 0.16: fxcop,
> xsd, wsdl. Sandcastle plugin would also be a big plus. Wix for Windows
> Installer generation would also be useful.
After lurking in the ml for a while, I can take a look at helping out
with the fxcop plugin. It doesnt seem that complex, so perhaps it can
be a good starting point for me. Is there a branch for 0.16+ or is it
trunk?
Im new to maven development so Im trying to figure out what the fxcop
plugin outputs. Fxcopcmd will write to an XML file, but can that be
displayed through the plugin?
I think StyleCop would be a nice plugin addition as well.
regards
//Erik
> Languages: VB.NET
> Visual Studio: The goal here would be to port (or rewrite where necessary)
> the 0.15 work to trunk. Personally, I think the easiest thing to do is to
> start with the cs project generators. Also we need to find out what would be
> reusable for VS 2008.
>
> Shane
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I went through JIRA and did this:
>> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it keeps
>> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
>> - closed a couple of old ones out
>> - marked 0.15 as released
>>
>> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features from
>> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what will
>> NMaven 1.0 be?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
>
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>.
For 0.16:
Features currently in trunk:
* NUnit (Evan completed this but still need to fully test)
* More Archetypes (already have a number of new ones)
Partial:
* Toolchain - I implemented this off of the work in 2.0.x branch but need to
test out with the latest 2.0.9 release.
New 0.16+
Plugins: We have a number of plugins in 0.14 that are not in 0.16: fxcop,
xsd, wsdl. Sandcastle plugin would also be a big plus. Wix for Windows
Installer generation would also be useful.
Languages: VB.NET
Visual Studio: The goal here would be to port (or rewrite where necessary)
the 0.15 work to trunk. Personally, I think the easiest thing to do is to
start with the cs project generators. Also we need to find out what would be
reusable for VS 2008.
Shane
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went through JIRA and did this:
> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it keeps
> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
> - closed a couple of old ones out
> - marked 0.15 as released
>
> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features from
> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what will
> NMaven 1.0 be?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Evan Worley <ev...@gmail.com>.
Oh there it is. Either I was looking at a cached version of the site, or
there have been updates, because I totally missed that. That looks good and
will help us focus on the features for 0.16.
Thanks!
Evan
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2008, at 2:23 PM, Evan Worley wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing that Brett, the site looks nice and the information is
>> much
>> more up to date and relevant.
>>
>> Is there a Maven best practice we could use to document our 0.16 release
>> plan, at least what features will be in 0.16? I didn't see this info on
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nmaven.html or
>> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
>>
>
> There isn't really a standard for that. I did put it under here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/roadmap.html
>
> But that's just the stuff from this list.
>
> The general pattern is to come up with a short list of things to aim for
> and list them out with corresponding JIRAs, then work off that to track the
> work and later produce the release notes.
>
> - Brett
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Evan
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I've scrubbed up the site, and included this:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2008, at 2:33 AM, Evan Worley wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this Brett.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> All, it would be nice to document this somewhere so we can create a more
>>>> stable definition of what a given release includes, and also easily
>>>> assess
>>>> how we are doing in meeting that release plan. Does anyone want to
>>>> volunteer to create something like this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Evan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I went through JIRA and did this:
>>>>> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it
>>>>> keeps
>>>>> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
>>>>> - closed a couple of old ones out
>>>>> - marked 0.15 as released
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features
>>>>> from
>>>>> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what
>>>>> will
>>>>> NMaven 1.0 be?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>> Brett Porter
>>> brett@apache.org
>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 16/06/2008, at 2:23 PM, Evan Worley wrote:
> Thanks for doing that Brett, the site looks nice and the information
> is much
> more up to date and relevant.
>
> Is there a Maven best practice we could use to document our 0.16
> release
> plan, at least what features will be in 0.16? I didn't see this
> info on
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nmaven.html or
> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
There isn't really a standard for that. I did put it under here:
http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/roadmap.html
But that's just the stuff from this list.
The general pattern is to come up with a short list of things to aim
for and list them out with corresponding JIRAs, then work off that to
track the work and later produce the release notes.
- Brett
>
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I've scrubbed up the site, and included this:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> On 09/06/2008, at 2:33 AM, Evan Worley wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for doing this Brett.
>>>
>>> All, it would be nice to document this somewhere so we can create
>>> a more
>>> stable definition of what a given release includes, and also
>>> easily assess
>>> how we are doing in meeting that release plan. Does anyone want to
>>> volunteer to create something like this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Evan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I went through JIRA and did this:
>>>> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so
>>>> it
>>>> keeps
>>>> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
>>>> - closed a couple of old ones out
>>>> - marked 0.15 as released
>>>>
>>>> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of
>>>> features
>>>> from
>>>> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter,
>>>> what will
>>>> NMaven 1.0 be?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Evan Worley <ev...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for doing that Brett, the site looks nice and the information is much
more up to date and relevant.
Is there a Maven best practice we could use to document our 0.16 release
plan, at least what features will be in 0.16? I didn't see this info on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nmaven.html or
http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
Thanks,
Evan
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've scrubbed up the site, and included this:
> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> On 09/06/2008, at 2:33 AM, Evan Worley wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this Brett.
>>
>> All, it would be nice to document this somewhere so we can create a more
>> stable definition of what a given release includes, and also easily assess
>> how we are doing in meeting that release plan. Does anyone want to
>> volunteer to create something like this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Evan
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I went through JIRA and did this:
>>> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it
>>> keeps
>>> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
>>> - closed a couple of old ones out
>>> - marked 0.15 as released
>>>
>>> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features
>>> from
>>> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what will
>>> NMaven 1.0 be?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brett
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brett Porter
>>> brett@apache.org
>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I've scrubbed up the site, and included this:
http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/
Thoughts?
On 09/06/2008, at 2:33 AM, Evan Worley wrote:
> Thanks for doing this Brett.
>
> All, it would be nice to document this somewhere so we can create a
> more
> stable definition of what a given release includes, and also easily
> assess
> how we are doing in meeting that release plan. Does anyone want to
> volunteer to create something like this?
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I went through JIRA and did this:
>> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so
>> it keeps
>> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
>> - closed a couple of old ones out
>> - marked 0.15 as released
>>
>> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of
>> features from
>> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what
>> will
>> NMaven 1.0 be?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: roadmap for 0.16?
Posted by Evan Worley <ev...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for doing this Brett.
All, it would be nice to document this somewhere so we can create a more
stable definition of what a given release includes, and also easily assess
how we are doing in meeting that release plan. Does anyone want to
volunteer to create something like this?
Thanks,
Evan
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went through JIRA and did this:
> - anything that was set to affect 0.14, I set to fix for 0.14, so it keeps
> the rest of JIRA a bit clearer.
> - closed a couple of old ones out
> - marked 0.15 as released
>
> Now, what should be included in 0.16? Should it be a list of features from
> 0.14 to finish porting, or a subset of those? For that matter, what will
> NMaven 1.0 be?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>