You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2008/06/10 22:01:47 UTC
hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
(Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based from here on
out. Its less confusing.)
0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out --- run it,
review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any issues with this
new version.
Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
Thanks,
St.Ack
Re: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
If it can't be reproduced, I'd suggest it not hold up the release. We
can always make a 0.1.4 later.
St.Ack
Jim Kellerman wrote:
> I should note that while this is a problem for us internally at Powerset, I have found it hard to reproduce in a simple test case. Please, if you are having problems with HTable.getRow, add to jira HBASE-673 and if you can produce a simple reproducable test case it would be ***greatly*** appreciated.
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Kellerman [mailto:jim@powerset.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:26 PM
>> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>>
>> +- 0:
>>
>> HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How
>> important is HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move
>> 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
>>
>> If it is important to you, please vote -1.
>>
>> ---
>> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
>>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>>>
>>> I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
>>>
>>> (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based
>>>
>> from here
>>
>>> on out. Its less confusing.)
>>>
>>> 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out
>>>
>> --- run it,
>>
>>> review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any issues
>>>
>> with this
>>
>>> new version.
>>>
>>> Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
>>>
>>> To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
>>> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>>>
>>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
>> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
>> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>>
>>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Posted by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com>.
I should note that while this is a problem for us internally at Powerset, I have found it hard to reproduce in a simple test case. Please, if you are having problems with HTable.getRow, add to jira HBASE-673 and if you can produce a simple reproducable test case it would be ***greatly*** appreciated.
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Kellerman [mailto:jim@powerset.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:26 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>
> +- 0:
>
> HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How
> important is HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move
> 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
>
> If it is important to you, please vote -1.
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
> > To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
> >
> > I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
> >
> > (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based
> from here
> > on out. Its less confusing.)
> >
> > 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out
> --- run it,
> > review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any issues
> with this
> > new version.
> >
> > Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
> >
> > To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> > Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
> >
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
Re: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Posted by Clint Morgan <cl...@gmail.com>.
We use getRow() everytime we want a single row (we almost always want
multiple columns).
We're running a patched version of TRUNK with light development usage,
and have not seen any issues.
So getRow() is important for us, but we won't use 0.1 so won't pollute
the vote...
-clint
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com> wrote:
> +- 0:
>
> HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How important is HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
>
> If it is important to you, please vote -1.
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>>
>> I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
>>
>> (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based
>> from here on out. Its less confusing.)
>>
>> 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out ---
>> run it, review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any
>> issues with this new version.
>>
>> Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
>>
>> To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
>> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Posted by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com>.
Since HBASE-673 has been deemed not critical for hbase-0.1.3 I have removed it as a blocker and set its priority to major from blocker. hbase-0.1.3 can go out as is.
As I have been using it for some time, +1 on this release.
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Kellerman [mailto:jim@powerset.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:26 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>
> +- 0:
>
> HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How
> important is HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move
> 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
>
> If it is important to you, please vote -1.
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
> > To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
> >
> > I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
> >
> > (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based
> from here
> > on out. Its less confusing.)
> >
> > 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out
> --- run it,
> > review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any issues
> with this
> > new version.
> >
> > Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
> >
> > To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> > Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
> >
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
RE: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
Posted by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com>.
+- 0:
HBASE-673 is unresolved. Question (to the community): How important is HTable.getRow ? If not so much, then we can move 673 to a future release or make it wontfix for hbase-0.1.x.
If it is important to you, please vote -1.
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:02 PM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: hbase 0.1.3 release candidate 1
>
> I've put up the first release candidate for hbase 0.1.3 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-1/
>
> (Candidates used to be zero-based. Lets make them 1-based
> from here on out. Its less confusing.)
>
> 0.1.3 fixes a couple of critical bugs. Please try it out ---
> run it, review documentation, etc. -- and let us know if any
> issues with this new version.
>
> Lets close the voting on release, Thursday, June 12th.
>
> To be clear, hbase 0.1.x versions require hadoop 0.16.x.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release
> Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 AM