You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2011/01/24 16:05:51 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1062778 - /cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
Willem,
I'm just curious (this isn't a veto or anything), why was this needed?
org.omg classes are built into the JDK and thus SHOULD be available in every
OSGi runtime since it's built into the JDK. Basically, since it's JDK
provided, it would always be resolved anyway and thus available.
Anyway, I'm just curious. :-)
Dan
On Monday 24 January 2011 9:02:15 am ningjiang@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ningjiang
> Date: Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
> New Revision: 1062778
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062778&view=rev
> Log:
> CXF-3279 Marking the imports of the CORABA package to be optional
>
> Modified:
> cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
>
> Modified: cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml?rev
> =1062778&r1=1062777&r2=1062778&view=diff
> ==========================================================================
> ==== --- cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml (original)
> +++ cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@
> org.junit*;resolution:=optional,
> org.mozilla.javascript*;resolution:=optional,
> org.objectweb.asm*;version="[2.0,4)",
> + org.omg*;resolution:=optional,
>
> org.slf4j*;resolution:=optional;version="[1.5,2)",
> org.springframework*;resolution:=optional;version="[2.5,4)",
> javax.activation;version="[0.0,2)",
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: svn commit: r1062778 - /cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan,
Yeah, JDK ships the CORBA implementation.
But if the customer doesn't want to the JDK's one and use other ORB
implementation, these imports mandatory will cause some trouble and
customer had to modify the etc/jre.properties of karaf himself.
Willem
On 1/24/11 11:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Willem,
>
> I'm just curious (this isn't a veto or anything), why was this needed?
> org.omg classes are built into the JDK and thus SHOULD be available in every
> OSGi runtime since it's built into the JDK. Basically, since it's JDK
> provided, it would always be resolved anyway and thus available.
>
> Anyway, I'm just curious. :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Monday 24 January 2011 9:02:15 am ningjiang@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: ningjiang
>> Date: Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
>> New Revision: 1062778
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062778&view=rev
>> Log:
>> CXF-3279 Marking the imports of the CORABA package to be optional
>>
>> Modified:
>> cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml?rev
>> =1062778&r1=1062777&r2=1062778&view=diff
>> ==========================================================================
>> ==== --- cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
>> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@
>> org.junit*;resolution:=optional,
>> org.mozilla.javascript*;resolution:=optional,
>> org.objectweb.asm*;version="[2.0,4)",
>> + org.omg*;resolution:=optional,
>>
>> org.slf4j*;resolution:=optional;version="[1.5,2)",
>> org.springframework*;resolution:=optional;version="[2.5,4)",
>> javax.activation;version="[0.0,2)",
>
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang