[jira] Closed: (OPENEJB-1017) Can't lookup EJB in simple-webservice example

["Jonathan Gallimore (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jonathan Gallimore closed OPENEJB-1017.
---------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> Can't lookup EJB in simple-webservice example 
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENEJB-1017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1017
>             Project: OpenEJB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: examples
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Jonathan Gallimore
>            Assignee: Jonathan Gallimore
>            Priority: Minor
>
> From the mailing list:
> OK.  One last small-brained question.
> In the simple-webservice example that ships with OpenEJB 3.1, the interface
> (CalculatorWs) is annotated with @WebService (and nothing else), and the
> implementation (CalculatorImpl) is annotated *both *with @Stateless *and *
> @WebService, and implements CalculatorWs.  The associated test passes (
> CalculatorTest)--and it only tests the web service functionality, not the
> EJB functionality.
> It's my understanding that in EJB 3.0 if you don't explicitly mark any
> business interface as being either @Remote or @Local, it defaults to @Local,
> so if you did nothing other than mark the implementation class as @Stateless,
> you would be implicitly "marking" the interface as @Local.
> And *that* would be tantamount to "marking" the interface as both @Local and
> @WebService.
> From these conversations, I would expect that if I were to add a test to
> CalculatorTest.java that attempted to locate the "CalculatorImplLocal" bean
> in JNDI, either that lookup would fail or an invocation on the
> resulting CalculatorWs
> interface would fail.  Is this correct?
> If it *is* correct, why is the CalculatorImpl class in that example marked
> as @Stateless (in addition to @WebService), since I can't see any way (from
> our discussions) that any test written against the EJB interfaces could
> pass?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.